2022
DOI: 10.2147/tcrm.s364022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes of 2111 COVID-19 Hospitalized Patients Treated with Hydroxychloroquine/Azithromycin and Other Regimens in Marseille, France, 2020: A Monocentric Retrospective Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This report does not aim to contribute to knowledge of the efficacy of treating COVID-19 with HCQ-AZ. Indeed, we have reported our 2020 data elsewhere [ 5 , 6 ]. More results will soon be discussed in the SARS-CoV-2 variant vaccination and post-vaccination era.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This report does not aim to contribute to knowledge of the efficacy of treating COVID-19 with HCQ-AZ. Indeed, we have reported our 2020 data elsewhere [ 5 , 6 ]. More results will soon be discussed in the SARS-CoV-2 variant vaccination and post-vaccination era.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HCQ-AZM have been widely administered to patients, and observational studies with thousands of cases have been published throughout the world [ 4 ]. In our center in 2020, this combination was associated with lower mortality among 2111 COVID-19 hospitalized patients [ 5 ] and 10,429 COVID-19 outpatients [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then checked the robustness of the results published in our previous studies on patients treated for COVID-19 in our Institute [10][11][12]. We did not detect any statistically significant differences in the number of deaths and transfers to ICU compared to those published in these three studies (Table 1).…”
Section: Retrospective Analysis Of Published Papermentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This inspired us to collect unbiased raw data and share it with the scientific community. In order to the database was findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable (FAIR) and as transparent as possible, we used raw data from different administrative sources, including hospital admission files and pharmacy prescription files, while recorded deaths were obtained from the French National Death Registry held by the Institut National des Statistiques et des Études Économiques (INSEE) (12). With this information we generated a retrospective cohort dataset of 30423 COVID-19 patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first one [2], has been adjudicated to be fraudulent by the former President of the board of this institute [3]. Further COVID-19 research has had significant ethical concerns arise, regarding the conduct of the studies [4,5,6,7,8] due to their purported retrospective nature despite the trial description appearing to be a prospective trial. These trials are also prima facie problematic because, from May the 11th 2020 and the removal of a special decree authorizing it temporarily, the use of hydroxychloroquine was forbidden outside of clinical trials in France, and these were not conducted as clinical trials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%