2011
DOI: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)34798-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes in the Ultrasound Follow-up of the Essure Micro-Insert: Complications and Proper Placement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the results of the present study, it is likely that in the study by Thiel et al [20] 3DUS was nondiagnostic or unsatisfactory because of differential positioning of the devices, which impaired proper 3DUS visualization on retrospective review of the cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Considering the results of the present study, it is likely that in the study by Thiel et al [20] 3DUS was nondiagnostic or unsatisfactory because of differential positioning of the devices, which impaired proper 3DUS visualization on retrospective review of the cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The objective of this small prospective ultrasound study was not to confirm that ultrasound could replace HSG to confirm tubal occlusion in patients undergoing hysteroscopic Essure device placement; larger studies have already addressed this issue [11][12][13][14][15]20,21]. Our only objective was to describe the difficulties that we have encountered in relying on 3DUS only as the technique of choice to identify and classify the position of the inserts after hysteroscopy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been demonstrated that micro-insert presence inside the interstitial portion of the Fallopian tube can be used as a proxy for tubal occlusion. [4][5][6][7][8] The ability to perform the test sooner than the currently recommended three months post procedure has the potential to increase patient compliance and reassure patients earlier of correct micro-insert placement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have demonstrated that the presence of the device in the interstitial portion of the Fallopian tubes amounts to tubal occlusion with no increase in failure rates and ultrasound is associated with much lower reported discomfort and pain than the HSG. [4][5][6][7][8] The current recommendation for performing the confirmation test three months post-procedure is derived from a peri-hysterectomy study. Women undergoing elective hysterectomy agreed to have the Essure procedure prior to their surgery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%