2012
DOI: 10.1308/003588412x13171221499748
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes in the repair of pilonidal sinus disease excision wounds using a parasacral perforator flap

Abstract: Outcomes in the repair of pilonidal sinus disease excision wounds using a parasacral perforator flap MR Venus, OG Titley University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, UK aBsTraCT INTRODUCTION The ideal treatment for pilonidal sinus disease has yet to be defined. There are many approaches described in the literature. METHODS Thirty-five consecutive patients who underwent wide excision of pilonidal sinus disease had the wound repaired using a parasacral perforator flap. Outcomes were assessed by case not… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various surgical options have been developed for the reconstruction of sacral defects, and since Koshima et al first described perforator flaps in 1993, [ 5 ] several designs have been suggested to treat pressure ulcers. [ 3 , 4 , 6 , 12 ] The main advantage of perforator flaps is that they enable a longer pedicle and a greater arc of rotation while maintaining the gluteus maximus muscle, and coverage of large defect areas using remote flaps. However, harvesting of a long pedicle is cumbersome, and isolation of the vessel poses a risk of vascular injury, which can lead to venous congestion or arterial ischemia and jeopardize flap survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Various surgical options have been developed for the reconstruction of sacral defects, and since Koshima et al first described perforator flaps in 1993, [ 5 ] several designs have been suggested to treat pressure ulcers. [ 3 , 4 , 6 , 12 ] The main advantage of perforator flaps is that they enable a longer pedicle and a greater arc of rotation while maintaining the gluteus maximus muscle, and coverage of large defect areas using remote flaps. However, harvesting of a long pedicle is cumbersome, and isolation of the vessel poses a risk of vascular injury, which can lead to venous congestion or arterial ischemia and jeopardize flap survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sacrococcygeal area has many perforating vessels on which flaps may be raised, [ 5 , 12 ] and design changes depend on which perforating vessel is selected and defect shape. Here, we report our experiences selecting a perforator based on considerations of relaxed skin tension lines (RSTLs) that have provided efficient flap designs that enable primary closure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of all the surgical procedures, the local flaps fill the defect, avoid a midline scar, provide tension free closure and can flatten the natal cleft and thereby offer advantages over direct closure techniques [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most accepted theory postulated that PNS is an acquired condition characterized by infected sinus in the 361 natal cleft area contains lifeless hair tuft [3]. There are multiple techniques prescribed for its treatment however the ideal method still not yet defined [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%