2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-019-05374-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes in modified transoral resection of diverticula for Zenker’s diverticulum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
7
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results are described by the most of authors (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)15,25). The only two prospective studies present in literature showed good clinical results in 77.68% and 76% respectively (6,7).…”
Section: Clinical Outcomessupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar results are described by the most of authors (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)15,25). The only two prospective studies present in literature showed good clinical results in 77.68% and 76% respectively (6,7).…”
Section: Clinical Outcomessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Two studies out of 20 were prospective (6,7), 11 were retrospective (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18), 6 case reports (19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24) and 1 clinical review (25).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Traditionally, the open transcervical approach to a Zenker's diverticulum has the advantage of complete diverticulum excision (diverticulectomy) in comparison to historic transoral techniques that focus on the division of the cricopharyngeus muscle and common wall between the cervical esophagus and the diverticulum (diverticulotomy). 12,13 Transcervical approaches have been shown to have longer operative time, hospital stay, and external scar, however this approach has reduced recurrent dysphagia and revision rates in comparison to transoral endoscopic approaches. 13,14 Endoscopic excision of the diverticula after cricopharyngeal myotomy, as previously described by Mortenson and Junlapan, 8,13 combine the advantages of endoscopic approaches while attempting to decrease the residual pouch size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12,13 Transcervical approaches have been shown to have longer operative time, hospital stay, and external scar, however this approach has reduced recurrent dysphagia and revision rates in comparison to transoral endoscopic approaches. 13,14 Endoscopic excision of the diverticula after cricopharyngeal myotomy, as previously described by Mortenson and Junlapan, 8,13 combine the advantages of endoscopic approaches while attempting to decrease the residual pouch size. Both techniques combine endoscopic cricopharyngeal myotomy followed by medial retraction of the pouch and excision using either cold instrumentation (Mortenson) or CO2 laser (Junlapan).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%