1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00519-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes in breast cancer patients relative to margin status after treatment with breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy: the University of Pennsylvania experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
3
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
55
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Tumor size was found to be associated with positive surgical margins by Peterson et al, [5] Park et al [6] and Tartter et al [7] by univariate analysis. Tartter et al [7] and Luu et al [8] demonstrated by multivariate analysis also, that tumor size showed a significant correlation with surgical margins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tumor size was found to be associated with positive surgical margins by Peterson et al, [5] Park et al [6] and Tartter et al [7] by univariate analysis. Tartter et al [7] and Luu et al [8] demonstrated by multivariate analysis also, that tumor size showed a significant correlation with surgical margins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…[5][6][7][8][13][14][15] Those which were significant included younger age, DCIS, extensive intraductal component, positive family history, lymphovascular invasion, axillary node positivity status and large tumor size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,20 Other studies have assessed surgical margin according to distance from the cut edge, 17 but these distances varied by Ͻ 1 mm, Ͻ 2mm, or Ͻ 10mm. 14,19,39 In the current study, the majority of close margins (Յ 5 mm from the cut edge of the specimen) were regarded as positive margins. Although judgment of margin status depends on each institution, meticulous histologic assessment was done in all institutions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28,29 Considering that late distant metastases are not likely to develop so frequently after mastectomy, IBTR may be a cause of DM in such cases. Up to now, many investigators thought that IBTR was only a marker for DM 19,20,23,24 because many cases of IBTR that subsequently developed DM had more aggressive primary tumor characteristics. Recently, however, it appears that additional radiation may lead to a survival benefit, suggesting IBTR may, in part, be a cause of DM, especially in cases of IBTR who develop late DM.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the majority of the reported series, positive margins of resection have been associated with an increased risk of breast recurrence, although the magnitude has varied considerably (Table 10). 48,[53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61] The variation in these results may be related to the extent of the surgical resection for the primary tumor, the presence or absence of an EIC, the definition of a positive margin, the number of margins that are positive, and the extent of the margin positivity.…”
Section: Elements Of the Breast Physical Exammentioning
confidence: 99%