2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2022.108958
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes from a Spanish Expanded Access Program on cannabidiol treatment in pediatric and adult patients with epilepsy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a subsequent analysis of the same cohort, 22 which added 64 new patients, responder rate was confirmed to be around 68% [58-77%] at 12 months, consistent with our responder rate of 60% [45-70%] at 12 months. Furthermore, retention at 12 months for STP are consistent with other similar cohorts who reported a 53% 22 and were comparable to other drugs employed in the treatment of DREE such as valproate (78%), 23 lamotrigine (69%), 24 clobazam (67-51%), 24,25 and cannabidiol (61.4%), 26 and higher than others such as vigabatrin (55%), 27 brivaracetam (41%) 28 and topiramate (37%), 24 which may be explained by the good balanced profile of tolerability and efficacy in this cohort.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In a subsequent analysis of the same cohort, 22 which added 64 new patients, responder rate was confirmed to be around 68% [58-77%] at 12 months, consistent with our responder rate of 60% [45-70%] at 12 months. Furthermore, retention at 12 months for STP are consistent with other similar cohorts who reported a 53% 22 and were comparable to other drugs employed in the treatment of DREE such as valproate (78%), 23 lamotrigine (69%), 24 clobazam (67-51%), 24,25 and cannabidiol (61.4%), 26 and higher than others such as vigabatrin (55%), 27 brivaracetam (41%) 28 and topiramate (37%), 24 which may be explained by the good balanced profile of tolerability and efficacy in this cohort.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Long‐term effectiveness and tolerability have been confirmed in open‐label studies 7–9 . Finally, real‐world data information regarding the use of this medication has been reported in a few observational studies 10,11 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In a recently published real‐world retrospective study of 57 patients with highly active and extremely refractory focal epilepsy, 5% of subjects achieved seizure freedom, 42% showed remarkable seizure reduction of ≥75%, and an additional 28% reached seizure reduction of ≥50% with a median treatment duration of 11 months 10 . A further retrospective, multicenter, observational study involving 170 intractable patients reported a responder rate of 63% and a seizure freedom rate of 13% 11 . Similar to our patient cohort, these data probably reflect the spectrum of patients treated within specialized epilepsy centers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, in a cohort of 57 patients who received cenobamate for at least 3 months, 70% achieved a seizure reduction of ≥50% in the dose range of 100–300 mg/day in a dose‐dependent manner and 5% became seizure‐free taking cenobamate doses of >200 mg/day 10 . The second real‐world study explored efficacy of the drug in 170 patients, who received cenobamate during a mean time of 12 months, and revealed 63% responders with ≥50% reduction as well as 13% seizure‐free patients 11 . The study detected no statistical difference in improvement of seizure rates in patients who received cenobamate at a lower or higher dose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%