2014
DOI: 10.5761/atcs.oa.12.02059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes Following Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair Both Within and Outside of the Instructions for Use

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After the periprocedural period, there were only 2 deaths (1 in normal anatomy and 1 in hostile anatomy at 6th and 7th month, respectively). Previous studies comparing normal and hostile anatomy in unruptured AAAs showed that there was no statistically significant difference in perioperative mortality between the groups [5,6,18,19]. Our study revealed similar results in rAAAs that were treated with EVAR.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After the periprocedural period, there were only 2 deaths (1 in normal anatomy and 1 in hostile anatomy at 6th and 7th month, respectively). Previous studies comparing normal and hostile anatomy in unruptured AAAs showed that there was no statistically significant difference in perioperative mortality between the groups [5,6,18,19]. Our study revealed similar results in rAAAs that were treated with EVAR.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Size and severity of the rupture between the normal and hostile anatomy did not differ significantly therefore longer hospital stay in hostile anatomy could not be explained by this. Consistent with the results of previous studies on unruptured AAAs, the difference in major morbidity and survival rate between the groups was not significant in the present study [5][6][7]18]. In the present study, the reintervention rate was higher in patients with hostile anatomy, but the difference between the 2 groups was not statistically significant, and this result was similar to that of previous studies on unruptured AAAs [5][6][7]19].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, other authors have suggested that bare stents are not inferior to covered stents with regard to renal patency and protection against type Ia ELs [ 9 ]. We have reported good results in the exclusion of AAAs with challenging neck anatomy by EVAR procedures [ 10 ] and JRAAs using bare chimney stents [ 11 ]. Furthermore, we can only use bare stents for Ch-EVAR because covered stents are not covered by Japanese National Health Insurance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown in large clinical cohorts that up to 42% of EVARs are performed outside the instructions for use for commercially available stent grafts. 3,[17][18][19] Multiple measures have been developed to include more of these difficult necks for endovascular treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%