Outcomes After Labral Repair in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement and Borderline Dysplasia

“…In another study that defined borderline dysplasia as LCEA 20 to 25°, Fukui et al reported a series of patients with borderline dysplasia that underwent similar arthroscopic treatment. 6 They had 80 patients (82 hips) with a minimum 2 years of follow-up. They noted significant improvement in PRO.…”

Section: Results Of Arthroscopic Treatment For Borderline Dysplasiamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…8 The radiographic criteria for borderline hip dysplasia are variably defined in the literature. 4,6,[9][10][11] While there is general consensus that mild and moderate/severe hip dysplasia is best treated with PAO, [12][13][14] the efficacy and longevity of arthroscopic procedures for the treatment of borderline hip dysplasia are controversial. 15,16 In contrast, acetabular retroversion is characterized by excess anterior coverage of the femoral head by the acetabulum resulting in femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and subsequent joint damage.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Diagnosis and Management of Borderline Hip Dysplasia and Acetabular Retroversion

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Borderline hip dysplasia and acetabular retroversion are common radiographic findings in young individuals with and without hip pain. Orthopaedic surgeons should be knowledgeable about the radiographic findings, diagnosis, and appropriate nonsurgical and surgical treatment of these conditions. Borderline hip dysplasia is generally defined by a lateral center edge angle of Wiberg from 20 to 25° (some define as 18–25°) and is a cause of joint microinstability. The degree of soft tissue laxity can have significant implications for joint stability in patients with borderline hip dysplasia. The most common presenting symptoms are groin pain and lateral hip pain. Acetabular retroversion is defined by radiographic findings of crossover sign, ischial spine sign, and posterior wall sign. Individuals with symptomatic retroversion have a clinical presentation consistent with impingement, groin pain with flexion activities, and less commonly lateral hip pain. Physical therapy has been shown to improve symptoms in a subset of individuals with these conditions. There are multiple recent publications about arthroscopic treatment of patients with borderline hip dysplasia. These reports generally find that good short-term outcomes can be expected when using arthroscopic techniques that include labral preservation/repair and capsular plication. There are limited reports of periacetabular osteotomy as a treatment for borderline hip dysplasia. Publications focusing specifically on surgical treatment of acetabular retroversion are also infrequent. Periacetabular osteotomy has been shown to have superior long-term clinical outcomes to surgical hip dislocation with anterior rim trimming in patients with all three radiographic findings of retroversion. Arthroscopic treatment has been shown to have good short-term outcomes. Future work in the areas of borderline hip dysplasia and acetabular retroversion should focus on reporting long-term clinical follow-up of these surgical treatments and using computation techniques as a tool to determine appropriate surgical and nonsurgical treatment for each individual patient.

show abstract

“…E ven as experience with hip-preservation surgery has increased exponentially over the past decade, patients with mild or borderline dysplasia have remained a challenging group. Well-designed recent studies have demonstrated excellent results after arthroscopic surgery in these patients, 1,2 whereas others have demonstrated failure rates more than 30%. 3 Whether it is due to reports of good clinical outcomes, improved arthroscopic technologies, the technically demanding nature and increased morbidity of periacetabular osteotomy (PAO), or the high prevalence of concomitant cam deformity in dysplastic hips, 4 the use of hip arthroscopy in dysplastic patients has been increasing over recent years.…”

Section: See Related Article On Page 3240mentioning

confidence: 96%

Editorial Commentary: Revision Arthroscopy for Borderline Dysplastic Hips: A Borderline Surgical Indication

Blackman¹

2019

Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Patients with mild or borderline acetabular dysplasia who present with refractory hip pain are challenging patients. Recommending open versus arthroscopic surgery for these patients is a difficult decision, in part because there are conflicting data regarding the outcomes of these procedures. Equally challenging is deciding on a treatment course in a borderline dysplastic patient who has not responded to a previous arthroscopic surgery. Surgeons must give great consideration before recommending revision arthroscopy in this setting.

show abstract

Outcomes After Labral Repair in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement and Borderline Dysplasia

Cited by 94 publications

References 30 publications

Editorial: is the hip really a stable joint?

Editorial: is the hip really a stable joint?

Diagnosis and Management of Borderline Hip Dysplasia and Acetabular Retroversion

Editorial Commentary: Revision Arthroscopy for Borderline Dysplastic Hips: A Borderline Surgical Indication

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About