2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.06.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes after cochlear implant provision in children with cochlear nerve hypoplasia or aplasia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In participants with measurable ECAP responses, the percentage of electrodes with ECAP, ECAP thresholds, maximum amplitude, and slopes of the ECAP I/O function varied greatly among individual children, highlighting the variability of cochlear nerve function in individuals with cochlear nerve aplasia. Such variability may contribute to the various outcomes of cochlear implantation observed in children with cochlear nerve aplasia (Birman et al, 2016 ; Ehrmann-Muller et al, 2018 ; Yousef et al, 2021 ). Furthermore, in our patients, the slope of the ECAP I/O function and the maximum ECAP amplitude tended to gradually decrease, while the ECAP threshold tended to gradually increase, from basal to apical electrodes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In participants with measurable ECAP responses, the percentage of electrodes with ECAP, ECAP thresholds, maximum amplitude, and slopes of the ECAP I/O function varied greatly among individual children, highlighting the variability of cochlear nerve function in individuals with cochlear nerve aplasia. Such variability may contribute to the various outcomes of cochlear implantation observed in children with cochlear nerve aplasia (Birman et al, 2016 ; Ehrmann-Muller et al, 2018 ; Yousef et al, 2021 ). Furthermore, in our patients, the slope of the ECAP I/O function and the maximum ECAP amplitude tended to gradually decrease, while the ECAP threshold tended to gradually increase, from basal to apical electrodes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, children with cochlear nerve deficiency (CND) have poor outcomes after cochlear implantation. Previous studies reported that the benefits of cochlear implants (CIs) in patients with CND were worse than in other children with SNHL who had normal-sized cochlear nerves and varied greatly among individual children (Ehrmann-Muller et al, 2018 ; Arumugam et al, 2020 ). Although only a few patients can achieve simple open-set speech perception skills, most patients only exhibit improvements in sound awareness, and a few patients may experience no benefits following implantation (Kang et al, 2010 ; Kutz et al, 2011 ; Young et al, 2012 ; Vincenti et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only one study mentioned, that ASSR testing was inconclusive in patients with cochlear nerve aplasia without giving further information [20]. Also, Ehrmann-Müller et al referred to measurable ASSR thresholds in children with CNH and no ABR threshold as a basis for cochlear implantation and investigated the outcome without discussing the discrepancy of ABR and ASSR thresholds [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Se debe igualmente ofrecer un dispositivo auditivo, como por ejemplo un audífono con presentación contralateral de la señal (ejemplo CROS) o un procesador de sonido de conducción ósea 7 . Dependiendo de la disponibilidad, se puede considerar realizar un PEATC con estímulo eléctrico (grabación de ventana redonda o promontorio) para niños pequeños cuando no se logra una respuesta luego de un PEATC obtenido mediante estimulación acústica convencional, debido a que la implantación coclear se ha intentado en niños con aplasia o hipoplasia del nervio coclear, y ha dado algunos resultados prometedores 8 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified