2021
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1716990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcome Prediction in Patients of Traumatic Brain Injury Based on Midline Shift on CT Scan of Brain

Abstract: Background Clinicians treating patients with head injury often take decisions based on their assessment of prognosis. Assessment of prognosis could help communication with a patient and the family. One of the most widely used clinical tools for such prediction is the Glasgow coma scale (GCS); however, the tool has a limitation with regard to its use in patients who are under sedation, are intubated, or under the influence of alcohol or psychoactive drugs. CT scan findings such as status of basal cistern, midli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
10
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…15 In another study by Palekar SG et al, the male: female ratio was 4:1 with males more commonly being affected by head trauma. 16 Similarly in our study males were more commonly affected with male to female ratio of 2.6:1.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…15 In another study by Palekar SG et al, the male: female ratio was 4:1 with males more commonly being affected by head trauma. 16 Similarly in our study males were more commonly affected with male to female ratio of 2.6:1.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…25 In a study by Palekar et al, the abnormal pupillary response came out to be statistically significant in relation to outcome. 16 In our study, patients having satisfactory outcomes, 68 (64.8%) patients had equally reacting pupils, while only 37 (35.2%) patients had abnormal pupillary reactivities. This association was shown to be statistically significant in our study (p-value = 0.046).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 43%
See 3 more Smart Citations