Abstract:Four eyes of 2 patients with corneal edema due to Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy were treated with CXL using the standard protocol. Since no improvement in visual acuity, corneal clarity, thickness, or pain sensation was evident in any eye at month 12, 2 eyes of the 2 patients were retreated, this time, following intraoperative corneal dehydration with glycerol 70% drops. This retreatment also failed to produce any significant effect on vision, corneal clarity, thickness, or pain in either eye. Collagen crosslin… Show more
“…The histological analysis of BK post-CXL was reported by Arora et al [29] as they performed penetrating keratoplasty either 1 or 3 months after CXL in both groups, allowing histological analysis [30][31][32]. They also found insufficient improvements to VA post-CXL (1.925 ± 0.173 logMAR to 1.75 ± 0.296 at 1 month (p = 0.01) to 1.81 ± 0.23 at 3 months).…”
Purpose The success of corneal collagen cross-linking in altering keratoconus' clinical course has driven a search for further uses of this procedure. This literature review aims to analyze the scientific evidence available for the benefit of cross-linking in the management of ophthalmic diseases other than progressive keratoconus or ectasia induced by corneal refractive procedures. Methods A systemic literature review.
ResultsWe reviewed 97 studies. We found that collagen cross-linking can limit the progression of several other corneal ectasias, thus reducing and limiting the need for keratoplasty. Collagen cross-linking also can reduce the refractive power of the cornea and can be considered for a moderate degree of bacterial keratitis or when the organism is unidentified, which is refractive to antibiotics alone. However, the comparative rarity of these procedures has limited the extent of evidence. In fungal, Acanthamoeba, and herpes virus keratitis, the evidence is inconclusive of the safety and efficacy of cross-linking. Conclusion Current clinical data is limited, and laboratory data has not fully correlated with published clinical data.
“…The histological analysis of BK post-CXL was reported by Arora et al [29] as they performed penetrating keratoplasty either 1 or 3 months after CXL in both groups, allowing histological analysis [30][31][32]. They also found insufficient improvements to VA post-CXL (1.925 ± 0.173 logMAR to 1.75 ± 0.296 at 1 month (p = 0.01) to 1.81 ± 0.23 at 3 months).…”
Purpose The success of corneal collagen cross-linking in altering keratoconus' clinical course has driven a search for further uses of this procedure. This literature review aims to analyze the scientific evidence available for the benefit of cross-linking in the management of ophthalmic diseases other than progressive keratoconus or ectasia induced by corneal refractive procedures. Methods A systemic literature review.
ResultsWe reviewed 97 studies. We found that collagen cross-linking can limit the progression of several other corneal ectasias, thus reducing and limiting the need for keratoplasty. Collagen cross-linking also can reduce the refractive power of the cornea and can be considered for a moderate degree of bacterial keratitis or when the organism is unidentified, which is refractive to antibiotics alone. However, the comparative rarity of these procedures has limited the extent of evidence. In fungal, Acanthamoeba, and herpes virus keratitis, the evidence is inconclusive of the safety and efficacy of cross-linking. Conclusion Current clinical data is limited, and laboratory data has not fully correlated with published clinical data.
“…However, there is no established evidence of effectiveness of CXL in these conditions. Some authors claim its benefit in non-healing ulcer and symptomatic PBK while others consider this treatment ineffective 11,12…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors claim its benefit in non-healing ulcer and symptomatic PBK while others consider this treatment ineffective. 11 , 12 …”
Objective:To determine the Efficacy of Corneal Crosslinkage (CXL), using Corneal Topography, in eyes with progressive Keratoconus.Methods:This randomized control trial was conducted at Armed Forces Institute of Ophthalmology, Rawalpindi, Pakistan from October 2013 to April 2014. A total of 60 eyes of 30 patients were included who presented with bilateral progressive Keratoconus. Each eye of the patient was randomized either to a treatment group (Group-A) or control untreated group (Group-B) of 30 eyes each. A written informed consent was obtained from each patient, following which corneal crosslinkage (CXL) with topical riboflavin eye drops was performed. Follow up visit was done at three months post operatively, Corneal topography was repeated and recorded.Results:The mean age of the patients was 23.13±7.62 years (range 13 to 39 years). There were 26 males and 34 females patients. The mean simK value at the start of study was 50.94±4.84 diopters in Group-A and 49.73±5.24 diopters in Group-B. At three months follow-up, the mean simK value was significantly lower in Group-A (48.28±4.47) as compared to Group-B (51.11±4.85). Keratoconus improved/ remained stable in 34 (56.7%) eyes while progressive disease was noted in 26 (43.3%) eyes. When compared between the groups, the frequency of efficacy was significantly higher in Group-A (86.7% vs. 26.7%; p=.000) as compared to Group-B.Conclusion:Corneal Crosslinking was found effective in causing regression or halting the progression of disease in patients with progressive Keratoconus at three months follow-up, however, the efficacy of corneal crosslinking was unaffected by patient’s age and gender.
“…Although outside the scope of this thesis, it is worth mentioning the application of CXL in ophthalmology reaches further than ectatic disorders. Other investigated corneal indications of (mainly RF/UVA or RB/GL) CXL include pellucid marginal degeneration [126][127][128][129][130][131][132][133][134] , Terrien's marginal degeneration 135,136 , bullous keratopathy [137][138][139][140][141][142][143][144][145][146][147][148][149][150][151][152][153][154][155] , chemical burns [156][157][158][159][160] , melting keratoprosthesis [161][162][163] , corneal lacerations [164][165][166] and radial keratotomy 167,168 , brittle cornea syndrome 169 , as pre-treatment for corneal donor tissue [170]…”
Section: Alternative Indications For Cross-linkingmentioning
published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers.
Link to publication
General rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.• Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal.If the publication is distributed under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the "Taverne" license above, please follow below link for the End User
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.