2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1865-1682.2011.01256.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcome of Three Commercial Serum ELISAs and Faecal Detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in Consecutive Samples from a Cattle Herd with Low Prevalence of Paratuberculosis (Johne’s Disease)

Abstract: Paratuberculosis (Johne's disease) in ruminants is caused by Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP). Owing to the lack of accurate laboratory tests, diagnosis is challenging in subclinically infected cattle. To evaluate the long-term performance of serum ELISAs for the detection of paratuberculosis in a dairy herd with low MAP-prevalence, three investigations of all the cows and the consecutive testing of 33 cows suspected to be infected with MAP and 30 cows classified as MAP free were performed ove… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(36 reference statements)
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When blood samples with serological borderline ELISA per cent values were regarded negative, the agreement between ELISA and faecal snPCR was poor ( r = 0.26, P < 0.05). These results agree with a recent study testing 33 cows suspected to be infected with MAP and 30 cows classified as MAP‐free by three commercial serum ELISAs (Khol et al., 2012). The reason for more frequent positive PCR than serological test results is probably due to paratuberculosis being mainly a local disease in the subclinical phase remaining restricted over years to the gut tissues.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…When blood samples with serological borderline ELISA per cent values were regarded negative, the agreement between ELISA and faecal snPCR was poor ( r = 0.26, P < 0.05). These results agree with a recent study testing 33 cows suspected to be infected with MAP and 30 cows classified as MAP‐free by three commercial serum ELISAs (Khol et al., 2012). The reason for more frequent positive PCR than serological test results is probably due to paratuberculosis being mainly a local disease in the subclinical phase remaining restricted over years to the gut tissues.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Furthermore, the commercial ELISA used did not show any antibody response throughout the whole investigation period of the bull. These results agree with a recent study, in which 30 of 33 cows were classified as MAP‐free by three commercial serum ELISAs, although their MAP infection was previously confirmed by culture and PCR (Khol et al., ). Such negative ELISA results could be explained by the fact that ELISAs often used in the routine diagnostic of paratuberculosis are highly specific but lack in sensitivity for MAP‐infected animals, especially in the subclinical stage of the disease.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…A limitation of past longitudinal studies is the relative low sampling frequency, which may miss rapid fluctuations that occur in the intervals (typically 6 mo to 1 yr) between sampling events in control plans. Khol et al (2012) performed a monthly follow-up of MAP fecal shedding and antibodies for almost 1 yr to assess the outcome of commercial serology tests. However, the herd under study had a low prevalence (9% by real-time PCR), and more than 80% of the tested cows were MAP-negative in feces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%