Outcome of the public consultation on the draft Scientific Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms providing guidance on the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified animals

,

doi:10.2903/sp.efsa.2013.en-428

EFSA Supporting Publications

2013

DOI: 10.2903/sp.efsa.2013.en-428

|View full text |Cite

Outcome of the public consultation on the draft Scientific Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms providing guidance on the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified animals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2018

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Public engagement pathways for emerging GM insect technologies

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Policy and management related to the release of organisms generated by emerging biotechnologies for pest management should be informed through public engagement. Regulatory decisions can be conceptually distinguished into the development of frameworks, the assessment of the release of a specific modified organism, and implementation decisions such as location and timing. Although these decisions are often intertwined in practice, the negotiation takes place at different stages of technology development and suggests different roles for public engagement. Some approaches to public engagement are more appropriate for different purposes and situations, and it is not always obvious how to go about matching the approach to the purpose. In addition to the diverse technologies involved in generating modified organisms, there are diverse publics with particular interests and different kinds of knowledge. Institutional interests range from commercial development to public regulation and future uptake. Contextual features, such as agency mandates, may limit or structure the extent and approach to public engagement. Different convening groups (government agencies, public interest groups, academics, businesses) and the kind of decision that is being considered determine what kind of input is needed and how the engaging groups will be constituted. This paper considers how the context of the release of genetically modified insects for pest control requires expanding approaches to the design of the public engagement.

show abstract

Public engagement pathways for emerging GM insect technologies

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

hi@scite.ai

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Outcome of the public consultation on the draft Scientific Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms providing guidance on the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified animals

Cited by 1 publication

References 21 publications

Public engagement pathways for emerging GM insect technologies

Public engagement pathways for emerging GM insect technologies

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About