2009
DOI: 10.4103/0189-6725.48573
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcome of primary closure of abdominal wounds following typhoid perforation in children in Ile-Ife, Nigeria

Abstract: Abdominal wounds of typhoid perforation, though classified as being dirty, can be closed primarily with good healing outcomes. A multidisciplinary approach to wound management will reduce the incidence of wound sepsis and its associated morbidity and costs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
24
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
24
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This formed the basis for the practice of delayed wound closure by some authors [29][30]. All the wounds in this study were however closed primarily with acceptable outcome because of the logistic challenges of performing delayed wound closure in our setting, in agreement with earlier studies [31][32].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…This formed the basis for the practice of delayed wound closure by some authors [29][30]. All the wounds in this study were however closed primarily with acceptable outcome because of the logistic challenges of performing delayed wound closure in our setting, in agreement with earlier studies [31][32].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…In contrast to our study, Usang et al 5 20 has also concluded significantly less incidence of SSI after DPC for complicated appendicitis.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Recent studies performed on dirty abdominal wound closure methods showed no advantage of DPC in terms of decreased wound infection compared with PC. 5 While some studies associate DPC with lower rates of SSI (42.5 % in primary closure vs 2.7% in delayed primary closure) 3 , some show that PC has low SSI rates (9.1% in PC group vs 27.3% in DPC group).…”
Section: Inroductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent studies performed on dirty abdominal wound closure methods showed no advantage of DPC in terms of decreased wound infection compared with PC. 5 While some studies associate DPC with lower rates of SSI (42.5 % in primary closure vs 2.7% in delayed primary closure) 3 , some show that PC has low SSI rates (9.1% in PC group vs 27.3% in DPC group). 4,8 Although many studies have been conducted there is controversy in literature regarding method of closure in dirty abdominal wound.…”
Section: Inroductionmentioning
confidence: 99%