Outcome of One-Level Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Spondylolisthesis and Postoperative Intervertebral Disc Degeneration Adjacent to the Fusion

Miyakoshi, Naohisa; Abe, Eiji; Shimada, Yasuhiro; Okuyama, Koichiro; Suzuki, Tetsuya; Satô, Kôzô

doi:10.1097/00007632-200007150-00016

Cited by 173 publications

(104 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Survivorship analysis by Ghiselli et al [9] has shown that the 10-year survival rate of the L5-S1 segment after isolated L4-5 fusion was 90%. Miyakoshi et al [16] suggested that the L5-S1 segment does not have to be routinely included in fusion, even in the presence of degenerative changes, because the clinical outcome of L4-L5 fusion is not affected by narrowing of the L5-S1 disc. We also found that the incidence of distal ASD was much lower than that of proximal ASD.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Risk factors for adjacent segment disease after lumbar fusion

et al. 2009

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The incidence of adjacent segment problems after lumbar fusion has been found to vary, and risk factors for these problems have not been precisely verified, especially based on structural changes determined by magnetic resonance imaging. The purpose of this retrospective clinical study was to describe the incidence and clinical features of adjacent segment disease (ASD) after lumbar fusion and to determine its risk factors. We assessed the incidence of ASD in patients who underwent lumbar or lumbosacral fusions for degenerative conditions between August 1995 and March 2006 with at least a 1-year followup. Patients less than 35 years of age at the index spinal fusion, patients with uninstrumented fusion, and patients who had not achieved successful union were excluded. Of the 1069 patients who underwent fusions, 28 (2.62%) needed secondary operations because of ASD and were included in this study. In order to identify the risk factors, we matched a disease group and a control group. The disease group consisted of 26 of the 28 patients with ASD, excluding the 2 patients for whom we did not have initial MRI data. Each patient in the disease group was matched by age, sex, fusion level and follow-up period with a control patient. The assumed risk factors included disc and facet degeneration, instability, listhesis, rotational deformity, and disc wedging. The mean age of the 28 patients with ASD requiring surgical treatment was 58.4 years, which did not differ significantly from that of the population in which ASD did not develop (58.2 years, p = 0.894). Of the 21 patients who underwent floating fusion, only 1 developed distal ASD. Facet degeneration was a significant risk factor (p \ 0.01) on logistic regression analysis. The incidence of distal ASD was much lower than that of proximal ASD. Pre-existing facet degeneration may be associated with a high risk of adjacent segment problems following lumbar fusion procedures.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Risk factors for adjacent segment disease after lumbar fusion

et al. 2009

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Furthermore, the clinical implication of a radiologically demonstrated ASD is uncertain. Many authors have found no correlation between radiological ASD and clinical symptoms [15,21,22,26,30,31,35,44,46].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A prospective randomised study on the long-term effect of lumbar fusion on adjacent disc degeneration

et al. 2009

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The existence and importance of an accelerated adjacent segment disc degeneration (ASD) after lumbar fusion have previously not been demonstrated by RCTs. The objectives of this study were, to determine whether lumbar fusion in the long term accelerates degenerative changes in the adjacent disc and whether this affects the outcome, by using a prospective randomised design. A total of 111 patients, aged 18-55, with isthmic spondylolisthesis were randomised to exercise (EX, n = 34) or posterolateral fusion (PLF, n = 77), with (n = 37) or without pedicle screw instrumentation (n = 40). The minimum 10 years FU rate was 72%, with a mean FU time of 12.6 years (range 10-17 years). Three radiographic methods of ASD quantification were used, i.e. two digital radiographic measurement methods and the semi quantitative UCLA grading scale. One digital measurement method showed a mean disc height reduction by 2% in the EX group and by 15% in the PLF group (p = 0.0016), and the other showed 0.5 mm more disc height reduction in the PLF compared to the Ex group (ns). The UCLA grading scale showed normal discs in 100% of patients in the EX group, compared to 62% in the PLF group (p = 0.026). There were no significant differences between instrumented and non-instrumented patients. In patients with laminectomy we found a significantly higher incidence of ASD compared to non laminectomised patients (22/47 vs. 2/16 respectively, p = 0.015). In the longitudinal analysis, the posterior and anterior disc heights were significantly reduced in the PLF group, whereas in the EX group only the posterior disc height was significantly reduced. Except for global outcome, which was significantly better for patients without ASD, the clinical outcome was not statistically different in patients with and without ASD. In conclusion, the long-term RCT shows that fusion accelerates degenerative changes at the adjacent level compared with natural history. The study suggests that not only fusion, but also laminectomy may be of pathogenetic importance. The clinical importance of ASD seems limited, with only the more severe forms affecting the outcome.

show abstract

“…There is a controversy regarding the risk factors involved in the development of ASD [2,11,12,22,28,40,41,47,[57][58][59]. Non-rigid, dynamic or flexible instrumentations for lumbar spine have been developed to reduce ASD [17,18,27].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Does Wallis implant reduce adjacent segment degeneration above lumbosacral instrumented fusion?

et al. 2009

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Delayed complications following lumbar spine fusion may occur amongst which is adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). Although interspinous implants have been successfully used in spinal stenosis to authors' knowledge such implants have not been previously used to reduce ASD in instrumented lumbar fusion. This prospective controlled study was designed to investigate if the implantation of an interspinous implant cephalad to short lumbar and lumbosacral instrumented fusion could eliminate the incidence of ASD and subsequently the related reoperation rate. Groups W and C enrolled initially each 25 consecutive selected patients. Group W included patients, who received the Wallis interspinous implant in the unfused vertebral segment cephalad to instrumentation and the group C selected age-, diagnosis-, level-, and instrumentationmatched to W group patients without interspinous implant (controls). The inclusion criterion for Wallis implantation was UCLA arthritic grade \II, while the exclusion criteria were previous lumbar surgery, severe osteoporosis or degeneration[UCLA grade II in the adjacent two segments cephalad to instrumentation. All patients suffered from symptomatic spinal stenosis and underwent decompression and 2-4 levels stabilization with rigid pedicle screw fixation and posterolateral fusion by a single surgeon. Lumbar lordosis, disc height (DH), segmental range of motion (ROM), and percent olisthesis in the adjacent two cephalad to instrumentation segments were measured preoperatively, and postoperatively until the final evaluation. VAS, SF-36, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were used. One patient of group W developed pseudarthrosis: two patients of group C deep infection and one patient of group C ASD in the segment below instrumentation and were excluded from the final evaluation. Thus, 24 patients of group W and 21 in group C aged 65? 13 and 64? 11 years, respectively were included in the final analysis. The follow-up averaged 60 ± 6 months. The instrumented levels averaged 2.5 ? 1 vertebra for both groups. All 45 spines showed radiological fusion 8-12 months postoperatively. Lumbar lordosis did not change postoperatively. Postoperatively at the first cephalad adjacent segment: DH increased in the group W (P = 0.042); ROM significantly increased only in group C (ANOVA, P \ 0.02); olisthesis decreased both in flexion (P = 0.0024) and extension (P = 0.012) in group W. The degeneration or deterioration of already existed ASD in the two cephalad segments was shown in 1 (4.1%) and 6 (28.6%) spines in W and C groups, respectively. Physical function (SF-36) and ODI improved postoperatively (P \ 0.001), but in favour of the patients of group W (P \ 0.05) at the final evaluation. Symptomatic ASD required surgical intervention was in 3 (14%) patients of group C and none in group W. ASD remains a significant problem and accounts for a big portion of revision surgery following instrumented lumbar fusion. In this series, the Wallis interspinous implant changed the natural history of ASD and saved th...

show abstract

Outcome of One-Level Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Spondylolisthesis and Postoperative Intervertebral Disc Degeneration Adjacent to the Fusion

Abstract: There is no evidence from the results that postoperative narrowing of the adjacent disc and preoperative narrowing of the L5-S1 disc affects the clinical outcome of L4-L5 PLIF.

Cited by 173 publications

References 20 publications

Risk factors for adjacent segment disease after lumbar fusion

Risk factors for adjacent segment disease after lumbar fusion

A prospective randomised study on the long-term effect of lumbar fusion on adjacent disc degeneration

Does Wallis implant reduce adjacent segment degeneration above lumbosacral instrumented fusion?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About