2013
DOI: 10.4103/0019-5413.108899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcome of locking compression plates in humeral shaft nonunions

Abstract: Background:Nonunion of diaphyseal fractures of the humerus are frequently seen in clinical practice (incidence of up to 15% in certain studies) and osteosynthesis using dynamic compression plates, intra medullary nails and Ilizarov fixators have been reported previously. Locking compression plates (LCP) are useful in the presence of disuse osteoporosis, segmental bone loss and cortical defects that preclude strong fixation. We report a prospective followup study of the outcome of the use of LCP for humeral non… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
27
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
6
27
3
Order By: Relevance
“…22 In our study, all patients treated with LCP and bone grafting achieved 100% union. Our results were similar to Ring et al and Kumar et al 23,24 We would like to highlight the use of LCP in younger patients as it has good outcome and patients can achieve higher activity levels with heavier demand on upper extremity function. LCP is useful in all levels of humeral shaft nonunion.…”
Section: 10supporting
confidence: 90%
“…22 In our study, all patients treated with LCP and bone grafting achieved 100% union. Our results were similar to Ring et al and Kumar et al 23,24 We would like to highlight the use of LCP in younger patients as it has good outcome and patients can achieve higher activity levels with heavier demand on upper extremity function. LCP is useful in all levels of humeral shaft nonunion.…”
Section: 10supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Stable fixation and early rehabilitation are essential in obtaining successful results. [23] In accordance with those of previous studies, [6,8,16,24,25] oligotrophic non-union was the prevailing finding. The majority of the present patients underwent surgery at another clinic and were referred upon development of non-union.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…[33] In a study by Kumar et al, a union rate of 96% following LCP and autograft treatment was reported in patients with atrophic and hypertrophic nonunion of the humerus. [23] Saka et al also reported high rates of union and functional recovery using nails and autografts in cases of forearm non-union. [21] When coverage of the surrounding soft tissue was taken into account, it was presently preferred to harvest autografts from the iliac wing, as donor site morbidity was lower in this region.…”
Section: Lapcin Et Al Evaluation Of Outcomes In Aseptic Non-unions Omentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A recently published series evaluating the use of locking plate fixation for HSNU initially treated nonoperatively identified 2 of 24 patients with a postoperative RNP (8%). 25 Abalo et al 26 29 Although these series report rates of occurrence substantially lower than in our reported series, we believe that the focus of our report was RNP; thus, we only included patients with documented neurovascular examinations. Therefore, we are of the opinion that our critical evaluation demonstrates a fairly accurate representation of the risk of iatrogenic RNP after the treatment of HSNU.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%