2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00383-015-3791-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcome of laparoscopic versus open gastrostomy in children

Abstract: These two feeding-access techniques are comparable regarding complications, operative times and postoperative length of stay. The choice of surgical method should be individualized based on the patient's characteristics and the experience of the surgeon. The favorable results with LAPG in adults are not necessarily transferable to children since there are physiological and anatomical differences.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
12
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Local granuloma was found to be favoured by a button device when compared to a G-tube (OR = 2.8, p < 0.01). There is little specific data about granuloma, but other series [26] have found rather high rates (~50%) of granuloma after direct button use when compared to G-tubes (10-19%) [15,27]. The study by Sutherland,et al [20], found a higher rate of granuloma after G-tubes when fascial suture was performed and Liu, et al [28].…”
Section: Disclosure Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local granuloma was found to be favoured by a button device when compared to a G-tube (OR = 2.8, p < 0.01). There is little specific data about granuloma, but other series [26] have found rather high rates (~50%) of granuloma after direct button use when compared to G-tubes (10-19%) [15,27]. The study by Sutherland,et al [20], found a higher rate of granuloma after G-tubes when fascial suture was performed and Liu, et al [28].…”
Section: Disclosure Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 A surprising finding in this study is that leakage from the gastrostomy site was so severe in two patients that enteral nutrition had to be stopped and central venous access for parenteral nutrition was necessary. Leakage is a commonly reported complication after LAPG insertion, 21,22 but most can be handled conservatively by adjustment of the gastrostomy device or temporary stop of feeds. However, leakage has been reported to necessitate surgical revision of the gastrostomy but most often late after insertion.…”
Section: Major Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…G astrostomi uygulaması, enerji ve besin gereksinimleri sadece oral beslenme yoluyla tamamen sağlanamayan çocuklarda uzun süreli enteral beslenme sağlamaktadır, genelde de kardiyak ve nörolojik defisitleri olan hastalarda gerek duyulmaktadır. [1,2] Gastrostomide uzun zamandır temel yaklaşım, genellikle Stamm tekniği kullanılarak yapılan açık gastrostomi uygulamasıydı. [3] Stamm tekniğinden bu yana perkütan endoskopik gastrostomi ve laparoskopik gastrostomi (LG) uygulaması gibi minimal invaziv prosedürler geliştirilmiştir.…”
unclassified
“…[4] Çocuklarda laparoskopik cerrahinin gelişmesiyle LG uygulaması da popülarite kazanmıştır. [1] LG uygulaması ilk kez 1991 yılında literatüre geçmiştir. [5] LG, uygulandığı günden beri komplikasyon oranlarını azaltmak, ameliyat tekniğini kolaylaştırmak amacıyla farklı modifikasyonlara uğramıştır.…”
unclassified