2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.12.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcome of laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis in children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
23
1
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
6
23
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the mean SIPES operating times in children with perforated appendicitis were similar to those reported in other studies for conventional laparoscopic appendectomy [8][9][10]. Overall, our mean operating time seems to be slightly longer than the 22-42 min published previously for SIPES appendectomies in children [4][5][6].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Also, the mean SIPES operating times in children with perforated appendicitis were similar to those reported in other studies for conventional laparoscopic appendectomy [8][9][10]. Overall, our mean operating time seems to be slightly longer than the 22-42 min published previously for SIPES appendectomies in children [4][5][6].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…A number of reports in the recent literature have placed emphasis on the occurrence of postoperative intraabdominal abscess after LA [18][19][20][21]. Horwitz et al [20] performed a retrospective study of 56 children treated for complicated appendicitis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past decade, laparoscopic appendectomies (LAs) have gained favor as the preferred approach compared to open appendectomies (OAs) due to less postoperative pain, a reduced length of hospital stay, and a lower rate of wound infection in a number of meta-analyses [1][2][3]. LAs also have advantages of cosmesis [4,5]. It remains to be clarified whether there are benefits of LAs over OAs in terms of postoperative complications [6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%