Outcome of interventions to identify family history and risk management for women with breast cancer in the ambulatory setting

Abstract

6121 Background: In 2002, Kansas City Cancer Center (KCCC) performed a quality improvement (QI) project to evaluate how breast cancer patients were being assessed for family history and cancer risk management. A self-administered family history questionnaire was developed to improve the thoroughness of family history collected and education of clinicians was completed to improve the recognition of risk factors based on ASCO guidelines. Methods: Chart audits on 210 women with breast cancer at KCCC, were completed in the second quarter of 2005. All patients were under the age of 65, not undergoing chemotherapy. A risk management tool was developed. Scoring criteria for 2002 was replicated in 2005 as listed in the table . Results: In 2002, 171 pts (89%) had level 1 or 2 family history assessed compared to 207 pts (99%) in 2005, p<0.0001. In 2002, 47% had 3 generations assessed compared to 84% in 2005, p<0.0001. In 2002 and 2005, some risk factor management occurred in both groups, and was equal, 78% and 80% respectively (p=ns). Of those that had risk management 33% had level 1 in 2002 compared to 3% in 2005 (p<0.0001) a 91% reduction in identifying risk without subsequent management. In 2002, 58% had level 2, compared to 71% in 2005 (p=0.02) a 23% improvement in identification & management of risk. In 2002, 9% had level 3 compared to 26% in 2005 (p<0.0001) a 183% improvement in patients with a detailed risk assessment and/or genetic referral. Conclusions: By improving the assessment of family history and education of providers, women with breast cancer are receiving more information to reduce their risk for recurrence and complications. Patients who were identified as high risk for BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations were referred to either a nurse practitioner or genetic counselor. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Recovery Communities

“…555,556 While effective delivery of health, child welfare, and educational services improves the lives of families who are able to access them, integration of the social services and health systems has been shown to further improve access to and provision of necessary services. [557][558][559][560] System-wide education and training Recovery-oriented systems of care will ensure that concepts of recovery and wellness are foundational elements of curricula, certification, licensure, accreditation and testing mechanisms. The workforce also requires continual training, at every level, to reinforce the tenets of recovery-oriented systems of care.…”