“…10,13 Although the logical scientific process of thought indicates that such a conclusion should be interpreted with caution when addressing any other type of endophthalmitis, the reality has been the systematic delay of surgical treatment and only included as a potential option after failure of the initial medical treatment, after long periods of active disease with progressive visual loss or tissue, or as a "last-resource" type of treatment. 3,14,21,22 Evidence has shown us that the impact of such a stance in the case of IKE, in which the source of infection is contiguous to the intraocular space, leads to significantly different functional and anatomical outcomes from those reported by the EVS, with a high prevalence of NLP and a huge proportion of patients requiring enucleation/evisceration surgery to achieve the control of the infection. 14,23,24 Moreover, the presence of severe corneal pathologies, such as corneal infiltration, ulcers, or opacities, hinders the correct assessment of visual acuity at the moment of diagnosis.…”