1997
DOI: 10.1080/1355297x.1997.11719841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcome of Cervical Radiculopathy treated with Periradicular/Epidural Corticosteroid Injections: A Prospective Study with Independent Clinical Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
69
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
69
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Bush et al reported a satisfactory long term (4-112 months) recovery after serial periradicular and epidural injections in the cervical spine in their study with 68 patients [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Bush et al reported a satisfactory long term (4-112 months) recovery after serial periradicular and epidural injections in the cervical spine in their study with 68 patients [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In addition, the eight patients who previously received a cervical corticoid injection had better results with IDIC, particularly the four who received a transforaminal injection, suggesting than IDIC could be more effective compared with foramen injection. None of the published studies on transforaminal injections reported better results even though our population had longer pain duration [7,8,13]. A possible effect of chance or a placebo effect cannot be excluded in these few patients, but it can also result from treatment of the origin of nerve irritation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…However, radicular inflammation is a rationale for treatment with anti-inflammatory agents and local injections of corticosteroids. Because of the encouraging results of retrospective and prospective uncontrolled studies [6][7][8][9], interlaminar and transforaminal injections of corticosteroids are being used to treat patients whose conditions have not improved with conservative therapies. However, serious complications, including severe neurological sequelae from the spinal cord or brainstem infarction, have been reported with such treatment and especially with transforaminal injections [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transforaminal injections and selective nerve root blocks are thought to deliver medication in a more direct manner to the site of pathology. In a prospective review of 68 subjects with cervical radiculopathy, Bush and Hillier reported that 62% of patients reported relief after transforaminal steroid injections as opposed to 16% with interlaminar epidural steroids [19]. Although these injections may be effective, they are not without significant risk, including increased neck and arm pain, dural puncture, lightheadedness, vertebral artery injury, paralysis, cord infaction, cerebellar infarction and death [20][21][22] .…”
Section: Interventional Pain Managementmentioning
confidence: 95%