Outcome of cartilage at 12 years of follow-up after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Cantin, O.; Lustig, Sébastien; Rongièras, Frédéric; Saragaglia, D.; Lefèvre, Nicolas; Graveleau, Nicolas; Hulet, Christophe

doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2016.06.011

Cited by 39 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Of these, 23 had a prospective study design, and 18 had a retrospective study design. [43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60]…”

Section: Identification and Selection Of The Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

What’s the rate of knee osteoarthritis 10 years after anterior cruciate ligament injury? An updated systematic review

Risberg²,

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundThis updated systematic review reports data from 2009 on the prevalence, and risk factors, for knee osteoarthritis (OA) more than 10 years after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear.MethodsWe systematically searched five databases (PubMed, EMBASE, AMED, Cinahl and SPORTDiscus) for prospective and retrospective studies published after 1 August 2008. Studies were included if they investigated participants with ACL tear (isolated or in combination with medial collateral ligament and/or meniscal injuries) and reported symptomatic and/or radiographic OA at a minimum of 10 years postinjury. We used a modified version of the Downs and Black checklist for methodological quality assessment and narrative synthesis to report results. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO.ResultsForty-one studies were included. Low methodological quality was revealed in over half of the studies. At inclusion, age ranged from 23 to 38 years, and at follow-up from 31 to 51 years. Sample sizes ranged from 18 to 780 participants. The reported radiographic OA prevalence varied between 0% and 100% >10 years after injury, regardless of follow-up time. The studies with low and high methodological quality reported a prevalence of radiographic OA between 0%–100% and 1%–80%, respectively. One study reported symptomatic knee OA for the tibiofemoral (TF) joint (35%), and one study reported symptomatic knee OA for the patellofemoral (PF) joint (15%). Meniscectomy was the only consistent risk factor determined from the data synthesis.ConclusionRadiographic knee OA varied between 0% and 100% in line with our previous systematic review from 2009. Symptomatic and radiographic knee OA was differentiated in two studies only, with a reported symptomatic OA prevalence of 35% for the TF joint and 15% for PF joint. Future cohort studies need to include measurement of symptomatic knee OA in this patient group.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42016042693.

show abstract

“…Of these, 23 had a prospective study design, and 18 had a retrospective study design. [43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60]…”

Section: Identification and Selection Of The Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

What’s the rate of knee osteoarthritis 10 years after anterior cruciate ligament injury? An updated systematic review

Risberg²,

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…17 In their multi-centre study reporting long-term outcomes of 675 ACL reconstructions, Hulet and Graveleau 18 demonstrated an osteoarthritis rate of 29% in the medial meniscectomy group compared with 10% in the intact meniscus group.…”

Section: Traumatic Tearsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The knee meniscus: management of traumatic tears and degenerative lesions

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Meniscectomy is one of the most popular orthopaedic procedures, but long-term results are not entirely satisfactory and the concept of meniscal preservation has therefore progressed over the years. However, the meniscectomy rate remains too high even though robust scientific publications indicate the value of meniscal repair or non-removal in traumatic tears and non-operative treatment rather than meniscectomy in degenerative meniscal lesionsIn traumatic tears, the first-line choice is repair or non-removal. Longitudinal vertical tears are a proper indication for repair, especially in the red-white or red-red zones. Success rate is high and cartilage preservation has been proven. Non-removal can be discussed for stable asymptomatic lateral meniscal tears in conjunction with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Extended indications are now recommended for some specific conditions: horizontal cleavage tears in young athletes, hidden posterior capsulo-meniscal tears in ACL injuries, radial tears and root tears.Degenerative meniscal lesions are very common findings which can be considered as an early stage of osteoarthritis in middle-aged patients. Recent randomised studies found that arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) has no superiority over non-operative treatment. Thus, non-operative treatment should be the first-line choice and APM should be considered in case of failure: three months has been accepted as a threshold in the ESSKA Meniscus Consensus Project presented in 2016. Earlier indications may be proposed in cases with considerable mechanical symptoms.The main message remains: save the meniscus!Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2017;2. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.2.160056. Originally published online at www.efortopenreviews.org

show abstract

“…Regardless of how the meniscus is treated, however, the risk for developing knee osteoarthritis is elevated greatly after ACLR with concomitant meniscal tear compared with ACLR when both the lateral and medial menisci are intact 4,5,[7][8][9][10] . Knee osteoarthritis may be especially common in the medial tibiofemoral compartment 11,12 . Therefore, the investigation of factors associated with its development and progression is a critical step to improving treatment options and rehabilitation strategies for this debilitating disease.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Gait Mechanics After ACL Reconstruction Differ According to Medial Meniscal Treatment

Capin

Khandha

Zarzycki

et al. 2018

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Outcome of cartilage at 12 years of follow-up after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Abstract: Retrospective cohort study, level IV.

Cited by 39 publications

References 37 publications

What’s the rate of knee osteoarthritis 10 years after anterior cruciate ligament injury? An updated systematic review

What’s the rate of knee osteoarthritis 10 years after anterior cruciate ligament injury? An updated systematic review

The knee meniscus: management of traumatic tears and degenerative lesions

Gait Mechanics After ACL Reconstruction Differ According to Medial Meniscal Treatment

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About