2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00439-010-0837-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcome of array CGH analysis for 255 subjects with intellectual disability and search for candidate genes using bioinformatics

Abstract: Array CGH enables the detection of pathogenic copy number variants (CNVs) in 5-15% of individuals with intellectual disability (ID), making it a promising tool for uncovering ID candidate genes. However, most CNVs encompass multiple genes, making it difficult to identify key disease gene(s) underlying ID etiology. Using array CGH we identified 47 previously unreported unique CNVs in 45/255 probands. We prioritized ID candidate genes using five bioinformatic gene prioritization web tools. Gene priority lists we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, of the 1354 individuals with ID/DD/MCA/autism analyzed using Agilent’s 44 K and 180 K oligonucleotide arrays, 176 patients (13.0%) were detected with pCNVs, chromosomal structural abnormalities and aneuploidies. This diagnostic yield is in consistent with the reported range of 12%-20% by several studies [5-13,24-26]. Of all the abnormal cases, the largest proportion (37.5%) belongs to recurrent genomic disorders and the other two significant groups are subtelomeric rearrangements (25.6%) and sporadic interstitial abnormalities (18.8%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In this study, of the 1354 individuals with ID/DD/MCA/autism analyzed using Agilent’s 44 K and 180 K oligonucleotide arrays, 176 patients (13.0%) were detected with pCNVs, chromosomal structural abnormalities and aneuploidies. This diagnostic yield is in consistent with the reported range of 12%-20% by several studies [5-13,24-26]. Of all the abnormal cases, the largest proportion (37.5%) belongs to recurrent genomic disorders and the other two significant groups are subtelomeric rearrangements (25.6%) and sporadic interstitial abnormalities (18.8%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…24,25 Tag SNP selection and genotyping Eight Tag SNPs for XPO1 and three Tag SNPs in OTX1 and its flanking region (Supplementary Table 2) were selected based on Hapmap information, using the Applied Biosystems' SNP Browser (www.appliedbiosystems.com) and criteria as previously described. 26 Genotyping of the Tag SNPs was carried out using validated TaqMan SNP assays (Applied Biosystems) as previously described.…”
Section: Array Cghmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We show that a list of genes ordered by prevalence in GO (and other schemes that might be viewed as alternatives such as KEGG) performs comparably or better to real machine learning algorithms over many prediction tasks, despite lacking any specificity to the particular learning task. In another paper we provide anecdotal evidence that such effects are likely to be at play in disease candidate gene prioritization 6 . Further, node degree in many networks is correlated with the number of GO terms a gene has, so that much of the performance as evaluated with ROC curves can be explained by algorithms simply assigning all functions to high-degree nodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%