Outcome nach Intensivtherapie

Schuster, H.-P.

doi:10.1007/bf03043283

Cited by 9 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The reference lists of six existing reviews were checked for additional references (Brooks, et al, 1995; 5 Chelluri, et al, 1995; 6 Brooks, 1996; 7 Heyland, et al, 1998; 8 Schuster, 1998; 9 Thomas & Manara, 1998 10 ).…”

Section: Reference Lists Of Selected Reviewsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Outcome measures for adult critical care: a systematic review.

Ja¹,

Na²,

Jenkinson³

et al. 2000

Health Technology Assessment

102

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

et al. Outcome measures for adult critical care: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess 2000;4(24). Health Technology Assessment is indexed in Index Medicus/MEDLINE and Excerpta Medica/ EMBASE. Copies of the Executive Summaries are available from the NCCHTA website (see overleaf). NHS R&D HTA Programme T he overall aim of the NHS R&D Health Technology Assessment (HTA) programme is to ensure that high-quality research information on the costs, effectiveness and broader impact of health technologies is produced in the most efficient way for those who use, manage and work in the NHS. Research is undertaken in those areas where the evidence will lead to the greatest benefits to patients, either through improved patient outcomes or the most efficient use of NHS resources. The Standing Group on Health Technology advises on national priorities for health technology assessment. Six advisory panels assist the Standing Group in identifying and prioritising projects. These priorities are then considered by the HTA Commissioning Board supported by the National Coordinating Centre for HTA (NCCHTA). This report is one of a series covering acute care, diagnostics and imaging, methodology, pharmaceuticals, population screening, and primary and community care. It was identified as a priority by the Acute Sector Panel and funded as project number 95/55/03. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Standing Group, the Commissioning Board, the Panel members or the Department of Health. The editors wish to emphasise that funding and publication of this research by the NHS should not be taken as implicit support for the recommendations for policy contained herein. In particular, policy options in the area of screening will be considered by the National Screening Committee. This Committee, chaired by the Chief Medical Officer, will take into account the views expressed here, further available evidence and other relevant considerations. Reviews in Health Technology Assessment are termed 'systematic' when the account of the search, appraisal and synthesis methods (to minimise biases and random errors) would, in theory, permit the replication of the review by others. Criteria for inclusion in the HTA monograph series Reports are published in the HTA monograph series if (1) they have resulted from work either prioritised by the Standing Group on Health Technology, or otherwise commissioned for the HTA programme, and (2) they are of a sufficiently high scientific quality as assessed by the referees and editors.

show abstract

Section: Reference Lists Of Selected Reviewsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Outcome measures for adult critical care: a systematic review.

Ja¹,

Na²,

Jenkinson³

et al. 2000

Health Technology Assessment

102

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Die Sterblichkeit von intensivmedizinischen Populationen liegt bei 8% [30]. Das Spektrum reicht von Patienten, die nur eine Nacht postoperativ überwacht werden müssen, bis zu denen, die nach Polytrauma oder im Rahmen einer Sepsis, mehrere Wochen intensivmedizinisch behandelt werden müssen.…”

Section: Schlüsselwörterunclassified

“…Die durchschnittliche ICU-Mortalität und Verweildauer aller Patienten der Intensivstation (7,6%,4,8 Tage) deckt sich mit den in der Literatur angegebenen Daten [30]. Die ICU-Mortalität unserer Langzeitpatienten, die zu den Schwerstkranken gezählt werden müssen, liegt ca.…”

Section: Diskussionunclassified

“…Alter und Gesundheitszustand vor dem ICU-Aufenthalt sind weitere unabhängige Faktoren [12,30], die aber auch auf die Art der Grunderkrankung Einfluss neh-men.So sind Traumapatienten jünger,Tumorpatienten älter als der durchschnittliche ICU-Patient. Alter und Gesundheitszustand vor dem ICU-Aufenthalt sind weitere unabhängige Faktoren [12,30], die aber auch auf die Art der Grunderkrankung Einfluss neh-men.So sind Traumapatienten jünger,Tumorpatienten älter als der durchschnittliche ICU-Patient.…”

Section: Demographische Daten Und Mortalität In Abhängigkeit Vom Ausmunclassified

“…Patienten auch mit extrem schweren Krankheitsverläufen können zu einem hohen Teil rehabilitiert werden [9,13,15,20,31]. Dieses Resultat, zusammen mit der Tatsache, dass sich die weitaus meisten Patienten unter gleichen Umständen erneut einer solchen Behandlung unterzie-hen würden [9,13,30],ermutigt zum konsequenten Einsatz aller Möglichkeiten in der Therapie schwersterkrankter Patienten mit langdauernder intensivmedizinischer Behandlung. Damit sind die Ergebnisse nicht wesentlich schlechter als nach durchschnittlicher intensivmedizinischer Behandlung [8,19,22].…”

Section: Demographische Daten Und Mortalität In Abhängigkeit Vom Ausmunclassified

See 2 more Smart Citations

Ergebnisse nach Langzeitintensivtherapie chirurgischer Patienten

Pajonk¹,

Fischer

Waydhas

et al. 2002

Unfallchirurg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The mortality after prolonged ICU-treatment is substantially higher compared to average ICU patients. However, having survived the acute phase of the illness, successful rehabilitation in somatic, psychic as well as social terms could be performed to a considerable extent. This outcome is comparable to the one of other ICU populations. The results encourage to a consequent use of all medical options.

show abstract