2012
DOI: 10.4155/cli.11.174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcome measures for clinical trials assessing treatment of cystic fibrosis lung disease

Abstract: Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a complex genetic disease characterized by death from loss of lung function. Therapies target pathophysiologic changes associated with pulmonary disease progression. Although therapeutic mechanisms differ, efficacy demonstration is limited to a few accepted outcome measures, each with shortcomings that are becoming more pronounced as CF population health improves. Pulmonary function improvement (as forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV1]) and reduction of pulmonary exacerbation risk are … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 127 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given our results, it further appears that it may also be infeasible to propose extended studies in which the control group is not receiving some form of continuous inhaled antibiotic treatment in populations most likely to benefit from a new antibiotic: patients with advanced lung disease and substantial experience with other inhaled antibiotics. Ironically, these are exactly the patients for whom an inhaled antibiotic treatment response in the form of sustained FEV 1 improvement or reduced risk of exacerbation are most likely to be demonstrated [12]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given our results, it further appears that it may also be infeasible to propose extended studies in which the control group is not receiving some form of continuous inhaled antibiotic treatment in populations most likely to benefit from a new antibiotic: patients with advanced lung disease and substantial experience with other inhaled antibiotics. Ironically, these are exactly the patients for whom an inhaled antibiotic treatment response in the form of sustained FEV 1 improvement or reduced risk of exacerbation are most likely to be demonstrated [12]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FEV 1 has also been an important primary endpoint in pivotal clinical trials assessing the efficacy of new therapies (5) (6). Historically, researchers have used varied approaches to analyze FEV 1 , which has limited comparisons across studies and universal interpretation of findings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical significance attached to PEx has justified use of reduced risk of future PEx and increased median time to next PEx as efficacy outcomes in the comparison of PEx treatments (12). In addition, randomized controlled trials of chronic CF respiratory therapies commonly include risk of future PEx and time to next PEx as efficacy outcomes (13). We conducted analyses of time to next PEx on a cohort of CF patients followed at the Cleveland Ohio CF Care Center (pediatric and adult programs) to identify patient phenotypic and treatment covariates associated with differences in hazard rates of experiencing a subsequent PEx.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%