2023
DOI: 10.1007/s11912-023-01412-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcome Measures and Patient-Reported Metrics in Cancer Rehabilitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 81 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 While the benefits and significance of employing PROMs to guide patient healthcare are well-established, they have not been used by a large number of oncology institutions worldwide due to unsatisfactory feasibility. 5 , 6 Feasibility emphasizes on necessary key areas including implementation, practicality, acceptability, and adaptation based on the feasibility study design. 7 It may be measured by clinic benefit (ie, patients’ outcomes), cooperation of patients (ie, time, completion rates) and acceptance of clinicians’ measurement (ie, resources/expense).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 While the benefits and significance of employing PROMs to guide patient healthcare are well-established, they have not been used by a large number of oncology institutions worldwide due to unsatisfactory feasibility. 5 , 6 Feasibility emphasizes on necessary key areas including implementation, practicality, acceptability, and adaptation based on the feasibility study design. 7 It may be measured by clinic benefit (ie, patients’ outcomes), cooperation of patients (ie, time, completion rates) and acceptance of clinicians’ measurement (ie, resources/expense).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%