Outcome instruments to assess scoliosis surgery

Bagó, Juan; Climent, José; Pérez-Grueso, Francisco Javier Sánchez; Pellisé, Ferràn

doi:10.1007/s00586-012-2352-6

Cited by 32 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 65 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The SRS is a disease-specific HRQL tool, recommended by a recent review as the preferred outcome measures for evaluating adult scoliosis surgery [33]. The SRS-22 covers five domains: function/ activity, pain, self-perceived image, and mental health all with five items and satisfaction with treatment with two items [34].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Quality of life outcomes in surgically treated adult scoliosis patients: a systematic review

2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Quality of life outcomes in surgically treated adult scoliosis patients: a systematic review

2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…No studies are known to have used surface topography to directly compare which questionnaires correlate better with HRQOL in AIS. Several studies have, however, used Cobb angle to do this [ 40 , 41 ]. Matamalas et al compared three questionnaires; SRS-22, SAQ and TAPS in idiopathic scoliosis [ 41 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Do the SRS-22 self-image and mental health domain scores reflect the degree of asymmetry of the back in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundPatient-reported outcomes are becoming increasingly recognised in the management of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Integrated Shape Imaging System 2 (ISIS2) surface topography is a validated tool to assess AIS. Previous studies have failed to demonstrate strong correlations between AIS and patient-reported outcomes highlighting the need for additional objective surface parameters to define the deformities associated with AIS. The aim of this study was to examine whether the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) outcome questionnaire reflects the degree of measurable external asymmetry of the back in AIS and thus is a measure of patient outcome for external appearance.MethodsA total of 102 pre-operative AIS patients were identified retrospectively. Objective parameters were measured using ISIS2 surface topography. The associations between these parameters and the self-image and mental health domains of the SRS-22 questionnaire were investigated using correlation coefficients.ResultsAll correlations between the parameters of asymmetry and SRS-22 self-image score were of weak strength. Similarly, all correlations between the parameters of asymmetry and SRS-22 mental health score were of weak strength.ConclusionThe SRS-22 mental health and self-image domains correlate poorly with external measures of deformity. This demonstrates that the assessment of mental health and self-image by the SRS-22 has little to do with external torso shape. Whilst the SRS-22 assesses the patient as a whole, it provides little information about objective measures of deformity over which a surgeon has control.

show abstract

“…There are many generic, condition-specific, and even superspecific measures of self-reported HRQoL and body image of patients with scoliosis developed [ 53 ]. We utilised the WHOQoL-BREF, a generic measure of the subjectively perceived impact of a disease, and its treatment on physical, mental, social, and environmental dimensions of HRQoL [ 36 ], rather than a condition-specific tool.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…We utilised the WHOQoL-BREF, a generic measure of the subjectively perceived impact of a disease, and its treatment on physical, mental, social, and environmental dimensions of HRQoL [ 36 ], rather than a condition-specific tool. One of the condition-specific SRS questionnaires has been adapted for adult populations [ 54 ], but the one available in Polish version [ 55 ] was developed and validated for use in adolescent populations of patients treated surgically [ 53 ] or as an outcome instrument of brace treatment [ 55 ]. Moreover, as our study regarded able-bodied persons and persons with mild-to-moderate deformities, our aim was to investigate their general HRQoL.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Does Scoliosis-Specific Exercise Treatment in Adolescence Alter Adult Quality of Life?

Płaszewski

Cieśliński

Kowalski

et al. 2014

The Scientific World Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective. Health-related quality of life in adults, who in adolescence participated in a scoliosis-specific exercise program, was not previously studied. Design. Cross-sectional study, with retrospective data collection. Material and Methods. Homogenous groups of 68 persons (43 women) aged 30.10 (25–39) years, with mild or moderate scoliosis, and 76 (38 women) able-bodied persons, aged 30.11 (24–38) years, who 16.5 (12–26) years earlier had completed scoliosis-specific exercise or observation regimes, participated. Their respiratory characteristics did not differ from predicted values. The WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire, Oswestry Disability Questionnaire, and pain scale (VAS) were applied. Results. The transformed WHOQOL-BREF scores ranged from 54.6 ± 11.19 in the physical domain in the mild scoliotic subgroup to 77.1 ± 16.05 in the social domain in the able-bodied subgroup. The ODQ values did not generally exceed 5.3 ± 7.53. Inter- and intragroup differences were nonsignificant. Age, marital status, education, and gender were significantly associated with the ODQ scores. Significant association between the ODQ and WHOQOL-BREF social relationships domain scores with the participation in exercise treatment was found. Conclusions. Participants with the history of exercise treatment generally did not differ significantly from their peers who were only under observation. This study cannot conclude that scoliosis-specific exercise treatment in adolescence alters quality of life in adulthood.

show abstract

Outcome instruments to assess scoliosis surgery

Abstract: Purpose To review and summarize the current knowledge regarding the outcome measures used to evaluate scoliosis surgery. Methods Literature review.

Cited by 32 publications

References 65 publications

Quality of life outcomes in surgically treated adult scoliosis patients: a systematic review

Quality of life outcomes in surgically treated adult scoliosis patients: a systematic review

Do the SRS-22 self-image and mental health domain scores reflect the degree of asymmetry of the back in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?

Does Scoliosis-Specific Exercise Treatment in Adolescence Alter Adult Quality of Life?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About