2014
DOI: 10.1177/0036933013518147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcome in excised thymomas: role of prognostic factors and impact of additional malignancies on survival

Abstract: This data confirms that Masaoka staging and WHO histologic sub-type are the most important prognostic factors in patients with thymoma. Moreover, thymomas predominantly arising from the thymic cortex are associated with a higher risk of developing other malignancies and with poorer survival. The cortical origin of thymoma could therefore be considered as a significant prognostic factor.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study showed that high PD-L1 expression in thymoma was significantly associated with WHO type B2/B3 thymoma. The WHO classification predicts thymoma prognosis as well as Masaoka stage, and some studies reported that type B2/B3 thymoma is associated with a worse prognosis than type A/AB/B1 [17]. These results might support the association between high PD-L1 expression and worse prognosis in thymoma.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…This study showed that high PD-L1 expression in thymoma was significantly associated with WHO type B2/B3 thymoma. The WHO classification predicts thymoma prognosis as well as Masaoka stage, and some studies reported that type B2/B3 thymoma is associated with a worse prognosis than type A/AB/B1 [17]. These results might support the association between high PD-L1 expression and worse prognosis in thymoma.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…These have demonstrated an essential role for αβ-T, γδ-Τ, NK, NK-T, B cells, eosinophils, and Tregs (adverse), as well as for IFNγ, perforin, IL-12, NKG2D, TRAIL, TNFα, and DNAM-1 in cancer prevention [112]. At the clinical level, evidence about effective immunity against pulmonary malignancies comes from (i) the 3.5-fold increased incidence of lung adenocarcinomas in AIDS patients compared to age- and smoking-matched immunocompetent subjects [113, 114]; (ii) the 2–2.5-fold increased incidence and high lethality of lung (among other) cancers in immunosuppressed kidney and heart transplant recipients [115-117]; (iii) the increased incidence of lung (among other) secondary cancers in thymoma patients [118], especially of the cortical subtype [119], which are associated with cellular immunodeficiency [120, 121]; (iv) the occurrence of cerebellar degeneration and other autoimmune disorders in lung cancer patients due to cross-reaction between tumor and normal tissue antigens [122]; and (v) the occasional spontaneous regression of small- and non-small-cell lung cancers [123, 124]. From the host’s standpoint, anti-tumor responses can be collectively viewed as a “cancer immunity cycle” that comprises an afferent (recognition) and an efferent (effector) limb, and is carried out by the innate and adaptive systems in concert [125].…”
Section: Immunopathogenesis Of Lung Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These variables were Masaoka-Koga stage, histology, MG, and second malignancies. Only Masaoka-Koga stage has been demonstrated to be a strong prognostic indicator of survival (16,17).…”
Section: Prognostic Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%