Outcome following Bankart repair for shoulder instability 1998–2002 using a subjective patient based shoulder questionnaire (Oxford)

Loughead, Jonathan; Williams, John R.

doi:10.1016/j.injury.2004.09.031

Cited by 4 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Eleven years after their initial operation, they have a response rate of 64% and have a mean score of 21.7, with 12% experiencing further dislocations or ongoing symptoms of instability. 29 Strong points of this study are the 97% long-term follow-up and the presence of an independent observer using validated patient-based questionnaires. A weak point is the fact that 10 years ago, generally 2 to 3 anchors were used, while presently, a large consensus exists to use 3 or more anchors.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Long-term Results After Arthroscopic Shoulder Stabilization Using Suture Anchors

et al. 2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Long-term Results After Arthroscopic Shoulder Stabilization Using Suture Anchors

et al. 2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…25 This possibly reflects the fact that the shoulder instability population is a predominantly young and mobile group, particularly in University cities. Future studies need to consider ways of increasing response rates, 10 perhaps using texts and electronic options.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of two patient-based outcome measures for shoulder instability after nonoperative treatment

Moser

Barker

Doll

et al. 2008

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Several names and abbreviations have been used synonymously, such as Oxford Instability Score (OIS) [19] and Shoulder Instability Questionnaire (SIQ) [20]. The instrument consists of 12 questions, each of which had five response alternatives, ranked from least to most difficult (1–5 points).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Oxford instability shoulder score, Western Ontario shoulder instability Index and Euroqol in patients with slap (superior labral anterior posterior) lesions or recurrent anterior dislocations of the shoulder

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundHaving an estimate of the measurement error of self-report questionnaires is important both for assessing follow-up results after treatment and when planning intervention studies. Specific questionnaires have been evaluated for patients with shoulder instability, but not in particular for patients with SLAP (superior labral anterior posterior) lesions or recurrent dislocations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the agreement, reliability, and validity of two commonly questionnaires developed for patients with shoulder instability and a generic questionnaire in patients with SLAP lesions or recurrent anterior shoulder dislocations.MethodsSeventy-one patients were included, 33 had recurrent anterior dislocations and 38 had a SLAP lesion. The patients filled in the questionnaires twice at the same time of the day (± 2 hours) with a one week interval between administrations. We tested the Oxford Instability Shoulder Score (OISS) (range 12 to 60), the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) (0 to 2100), and the EuroQol: EQ-5D (−0.5 to 1.0) and EQ-VAS (0 to 100). Hypotheses were defined to test validity.ResultsICC ranged from 0.89 (95% CI 0.83 to 0.93) to 0.92 (0.87 to 0.95) for OISS, WOSI, and EQ-VAS and was 0.66 (0.50 to 0.77) for EQ-5D. The limits of agreement for the scores were: -7.8 to 8.4 for OISS; -339.9 to 344.8 for WOSI; -0.4 to 0.4 for EQ-5D; and −17.2 and 16.2 for EQ-VAS. All questionnaires reflect the construct that was measured. The correlation between WOSI and OISS was 0.73 and ranged from 0.49 to 0.54 between the shoulder questionnaires and the generic questionnaires. The divergent validity was acceptable, convergent validity failed, and known group validity was acceptable only for OISS.ConclusionMeasurement errors and limitations in validity should be considered when change scores of OISS and WOSI are interpreted in patients with SLAP lesions or recurrent shoulder dislocations. EQ-5D is not recommended as a single outcome.

show abstract

Outcome following Bankart repair for shoulder instability 1998–2002 using a subjective patient based shoulder questionnaire (Oxford)

Cited by 4 publications

References 7 publications

Long-term Results After Arthroscopic Shoulder Stabilization Using Suture Anchors

Long-term Results After Arthroscopic Shoulder Stabilization Using Suture Anchors

Comparison of two patient-based outcome measures for shoulder instability after nonoperative treatment

Evaluation of Oxford instability shoulder score, Western Ontario shoulder instability Index and Euroqol in patients with slap (superior labral anterior posterior) lesions or recurrent anterior dislocations of the shoulder

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About