1997
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1997.tb04733.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcome effects of different protective hypothermia levels during cardiac arrest in rats

Abstract: In this model, moderate (30 degrees C) cooling improved neurologic outcome. There was no additional benefit from more extreme hypothermia.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(12 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is consistent with previous animal studies (28–30). A lower temperature of the central nervous system in ischemia has been correlated with a higher neuroprotective effect (31). However, deep hypothermia is associated with numerous side‐effects, such as arrhythmia, coagulation disorder and post‐operative infection at 32 °C or below (32, 33).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This finding is consistent with previous animal studies (28–30). A lower temperature of the central nervous system in ischemia has been correlated with a higher neuroprotective effect (31). However, deep hypothermia is associated with numerous side‐effects, such as arrhythmia, coagulation disorder and post‐operative infection at 32 °C or below (32, 33).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…When several depths of TTM were tested, a lower temperature around 30 to 33°C was sometimes favoured compared to "milder" TTM around 34 to 35°C [2,[57][58][59], but just as often there was no significant difference between lower and "milder" TTM [60][61][62]. In the preclinical meta-analysis on TTM as treatment of ischemic stroke, efficacy was greater at temperatures below 31°C [40].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have previously established and validated a rodent model for global ischemic brain injury following CA (Geocadin et al, 2000b;Geocadin et al, 2000a). Neurological recovery is monitored using a standardized Neurological Deficit Scale (NDS) which relies on serial performance of a comprehensive behavioral examination (Ao et al, 2001;Xiao et al, 1998;Yli-Hankala et al, 1997;Zeiner et al, 2000). The NDS was patterned after the standard neurologic examination in humans, incorporating some elements from functional outcome scales developed for global cerebral ischemia in rats (Katz et al, 1995), dogs (Vaagenes et al, 1984;Woods et al, 2000), and piglets (Goel et al, 1996;Sherman et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%