Outcome-based contracting and gaming practices in marketised public employment services. Dilemmas from the Italian case

Abstract

Concerns about the unintended effects of marketised public employment services are increasingly expressed because there is mounting evidence that such services are frequently characterised by various gaming practices on the part of their providers. To prevent these unintended consequences, payment-by-result approaches have been progressively strengthened. The aim of the research reported in this article was to investigate the extent to which such approaches are able to make service providers accountable for client outcomes. The study used two Italian regional cases in order to compare different and alternative contracting arrangements: Lombardy (outcome-based payments), and Emilia-Romagna (fixed payments). Drawing on rich administrative databases, the analysis relied on a quantitative methodology based on propensity score matching and logistic regressions. Even if outcome-based contracting can make service providers financially accountable for the service outcome, the results of the analysis show that it does not sufficiently prevent gaming practices, resulting in inequity among the services provided.

More money, more effect? Employment effects of job search programs in Veneto

“…This non-significant trend persisted when focusing on participants from territories like Veneto, Lombardia, or Emilia-Romagna. At the regional level, evaluations of similar programs in Lombardia and Emilia-Romagna were conducted by Colombo et al (2015) and Scarano (2023). The downside is that they employ a selection on observables strategies, so our research tries to overcome the limitations of their analyses.…”

Systems thinking for better social policy: a case study in financial wellbeing

“…This means that the filtering mechanisms which govern access to support are important, and in countries like Australia, access to support is becoming increasingly conditional (Collie et al, 2021;Considine et al, 2022). Recipients of payments need to undertake various activities which are theoretically designed to improve the likelihood that they will transition into employment (Scarano, 2023). However, the evidence suggests that they do not fulfil this function, and instead they are experienced as a punitive form of compliance activity which serves little purpose (Peterie et al, 2019).…”