Outcome and impact indicators for nanotechnology policies

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to suggest indicators for evaluating Iran national nanotechnology plan at the policy and program levels. Governments are required to evaluate their policies to be accountable to their audience and to improve their policies. The evaluation of nanotechnology policies both in academic and governmental institutions has been mainly confined to measuring the research and development outputs, while explicit models are required for evaluating national nanotechnology policies and programs. In other words, although policies are translated into several activities, it does not mean that the evaluation of activities results in holistic policy evaluation. Design/methodology/approach The present research uses a qualitative method to explore the process of developing a model for assessing nanotechnology policymaking in Iran. Expert opinions have been collected and analyzed by using local and international surveys to validate different elements of the model. Findings The model includes the evaluation time-frame, criteria and indicators for policy and program levels. Assessment at program and policy levels, as distinct from activity evaluation, measures the ultimate objectives of a policy intervention, based on which the outcome and impact indicators should be developed. This paper argues that the Iran national nanotechnology policy should be evaluated and revised triennially based on the model in which 46 outcome and impact indicators are included under three general criteria of appropriateness, efficiency and effectiveness. A number of these indicators should be evaluated annually or biannually. Originality/value The evaluation of nanotechnology plans has been mainly limited to assessing the research and development outputs that are related to the activity level. The main value of this work is developing outcome and impact indicators that are related to policy and program levels.

Facts and Figures on Materials Science and Nanotechnology Progress and Investment

“…Conversely, Iran had a negligible expression in nanotechnology until 2010, but has since experienced an exponential growth in publication contributions. This may be at least partly related to policy changesimplemented by the Iran Nanotechnology Innovation Councilto improve infrastructure, promote international collaborations, attract experts, and develop tools for measuring progress and impact . Such a seemingly successful measure can be reproduced by other countries.…”