2022
DOI: 10.1111/cod.14079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outbreak of occupational allergic contact dermatitis from a smartphone screen protector glue

Abstract: Background Sensitization to acrylates is a concern in the occupational/environmental dermatology field. Objective To describe an occupational allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) outbreak from a smartphone screen protector glue. Methods Thirteen affected workers of a chain store selling phone screen protectors were investigated in five Spanish dermatology departments. The glue datasheet and label were assessed. A chemical analysis of the glue was performed. Based on this, some patients underwent additional testin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous research, we had performed controls with ACMO 0.5% pet in 25 consecutive unrelated eczema patients without previous exposure to the glue 1 . In addition to these prior controls, we performed additional patch tests with ACMO in 13 extra controls with negative results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In previous research, we had performed controls with ACMO 0.5% pet in 25 consecutive unrelated eczema patients without previous exposure to the glue 1 . In addition to these prior controls, we performed additional patch tests with ACMO in 13 extra controls with negative results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Patch tests with ACMO 0.5% were positive in 6 patients, including 3 patients with prior positive patch test reactions to the glue. 1 Only one case report of ACD from the same glue product involving one employee of the same phone-protector chain store had been published before. 2 The patient was sensitized to IBOA, which was considered to be relevant by the authors because it was labeled in the glue product.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations