2013
DOI: 10.1086/669512
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outbreak of Fluoroquinolone-ResistantEscherichia coliInfections after Transrectal Ultrasound—Guided Biopsy of the Prostate

Abstract: The outbreak of fluoroquinolone-resistant E. coli infections after TRUBP closely paralleled rising rates of fluoroquinolone resistance among outpatient E. coli isolates. The delayed detection of the outbreak and the absence of sensitive predictors of infection suggest that active surveillance for infection after TRUBP is necessary in the context of increasing fluoroquinolone resistance in the United States.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 " 6 At the Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, an outbreak of fluoroquinolone-resistant E. coli infections after TRUBP coincided with rising rates of fluoroquinolone resistance among outpatient E. coli isolates. 6 Only 26% of patients developing infections with fluoroquinoloneresistant E. coli had received fluoroquinolones in the previous year, and only 49% were identified by a prediction rule that included prior UTI, prior hospitalization, and previous infection with fluoroquinolone-resistant gram-negative bacilli. 6 These findings suggested that modifying prophylaxis for patients with selected risk factors would have limited efficacy.…”
Section: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013;34(9):973-976mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 " 6 At the Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, an outbreak of fluoroquinolone-resistant E. coli infections after TRUBP coincided with rising rates of fluoroquinolone resistance among outpatient E. coli isolates. 6 Only 26% of patients developing infections with fluoroquinoloneresistant E. coli had received fluoroquinolones in the previous year, and only 49% were identified by a prediction rule that included prior UTI, prior hospitalization, and previous infection with fluoroquinolone-resistant gram-negative bacilli. 6 These findings suggested that modifying prophylaxis for patients with selected risk factors would have limited efficacy.…”
Section: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013;34(9):973-976mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Only 26% of patients developing infections with fluoroquinoloneresistant E. coli had received fluoroquinolones in the previous year, and only 49% were identified by a prediction rule that included prior UTI, prior hospitalization, and previous infection with fluoroquinolone-resistant gram-negative bacilli. 6 These findings suggested that modifying prophylaxis for patients with selected risk factors would have limited efficacy. Therefore, we examined the effectiveness of screening TRUBP patients for rectal carriage of fluoroquinolone-resistant E. coli with modification of periprocedure prophylaxis as a strategy to reduce infections after TRUBP.…”
Section: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013;34(9):973-976mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerned by what appeared to be a sudden increase in the number of cases, a case–case–control investigation was undertaken that did not identify increased exposure to antibiotics or other risk factors associated with the development of infection following TRUBP [5]. In the present analysis, we focused on the characteristics of the bacterial isolates causing infection after TRUBP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, fluoroquinolones are the most widely used antibiotic prophylaxis for TRUS-PNB [1]. However, several studies reported an increasing incidence of fluoroquinolone-resistant (FQR) uropathogens [6,7]. These findings urge the reconsideration of fluoroquinolones as the antibiotic of choice for TRUS-PNB prophylaxis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%