Out-of-pocket healthcare expenditure in Australia: trends, inequalities and the impact on household living standards in a high-income country with a universal health care system

Abstract

BackgroundPoor health increases the likelihood of experiencing poverty by reducing a person’s ability to work and imparting costs associated with receiving medical treatment. Universal health care is a means of protecting against the impoverishing impact of high healthcare costs. This study aims to document the recent trends in the amount paid by Australian households out-of-pocket for healthcare, identify any inequalities in the distribution of this expenditure, and to describe the impact that healthcare costs have on household living standards in a high-income country with a long established universal health care system. We undertook this analysis using a longitudinal, nationally representative dataset – the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey, using data collected annually from 2006 to 2014. Out of pocket payments covered those paid to health practitioners, for medication and in private health insurance premiums; catastrophic expenditure was defined as spending 10% or more of household income on healthcare.ResultsAverage total household expenditure on healthcare items remained relatively stable between 2006 and 2014 after adjusting for inflation, changing from $3133 to $3199. However, after adjusting for age, self-reported health status, and year, those in the lowest income group (decile one) had 15 times the odds (95% CI, 11.7–20.8) of having catastrophic health expenditure compared to those in the highest income group (decile ten). The percentage of people in income decile 2 and 3 who had catastrophic health expenditure also increased from 13% to 19% and 7% to 13% respectively.ConclusionsOngoing monitoring of out of pocket healthcare expenditure is an essential part of assessing health system performance, even in countries with universal health care.

Factors contributing to longer length of stay in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children hospitalised for burn injury

“…Remote Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children who suffer a complex burn have reduced or delayed access to healthcare for burns treatment and rehabilitation, creating longer hospital LOS. Adding in factors such as low SES, also more prevalent in this cohort, is likely to lead to additional financial burden from out-of-pocket healthcare expenses, which can create isolation and impact on recovery (Callander et al 2019 ; Hynd et al 2008 ; Jan et al 2011 ; Couzos and Murray 2008 ; Couzos 2005 ). Such factors can be further compounded by culturally unsafe healthcare, which creates a lack of autonomy or self-determination in the treatment and decision making process for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander families (Fraser et al 2019 ).…”

Is disability exclusion associated with experiencing an unmet need for health care?

“…In particular, studies have underscored the importance of high out of pocket healthcare costs relative to income, contributing to avoidance of treatment [8 -10]. For those experiencing poor health, it can have a deleterious impact on financial wellbeing due to withdrawal from the labour market alongside increased proportions of household expenditure being allocated to healthcare [11,12]. Among older Australians specifically, barriers to healthcare have included problems with cost and financial constraints, but also with long waiting times and the unavailability of appointments, with the problem marked for those with multiple health conditions and disabilities [12].…”

Catastrophic health care expenditure in Myanmar: policy implications in leading progress towards universal health coverage

“…Catastrophic payments impede access to health care. Catastrophic expenditure can occur in every country at all stages of development, even in countries with well-developed financial risk protection mechanisms, e.g., in Australia, the lowest income group had a 15 times higher chance of having catastrophic health expenditure compared to the highest income group [1, 2]. However, the highest catastrophic health expenditures are found in countries in transition.…”