2017
DOI: 10.1071/py16005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Out-of-pocket healthcare expenditure and chronic disease – do Australians forgo care because of the cost?

Abstract: Although we do know that out-of-pocket healthcare expenditure is relatively high in Australia, little is known about what health conditions are associated with the highest out-of-pocket expenditure, and whether the cost of healthcare acts as a barrier to care for people with different chronic conditions. Cross-sectional analysis using linear and logistic regression models applied to the Commonwealth Fund international health policy survey of adults aged 18 years and over was conducted in 2013. Adults with asth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
84
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Expense is a key driver of patients' decisions to seek, delay or avoid specialist services when they need them, as exemplified in a recent study of utilization of Medicare services:
Across Australia, 7.3% of people aged 15 and over who needed to see a medical specialist delayed or did not see a medical specialist due to cost (which represents an estimated 538 000 people) The 90th percentile threshold for annual out‐of‐pocket costs in this report (2016‐2017) was $601.
…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Expense is a key driver of patients' decisions to seek, delay or avoid specialist services when they need them, as exemplified in a recent study of utilization of Medicare services:
Across Australia, 7.3% of people aged 15 and over who needed to see a medical specialist delayed or did not see a medical specialist due to cost (which represents an estimated 538 000 people) The 90th percentile threshold for annual out‐of‐pocket costs in this report (2016‐2017) was $601.
…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…This observation was evident from 6 months onwards and is supportive of the hypothesis that medical expenses are particularly significant access barriers for diabetics above and beyond those that exist for nAMD patients. It may be that the comorbidity burden of diabetes and its economic consequences influenced this difference …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The affordability of out‐of‐pocket fees for health care warrants careful consideration, as these fees or “co‐payments” have the potential to negatively affect patient health by reducing demand for health care and causing patients to forego necessary medical treatment. Indeed, within Australia one in four people with a chronic health condition skip care because of the cost . The classic demand response to high or increasing prices is for consumers to demand fewer services; thus, the out‐of‐pocket fees set by practitioners play a key role in determining the number of services that are actually consumed .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, within Australia one in four people with a chronic health condition skip care because of the cost. 9 The classic demand response to high or increasing prices is for consumers to demand fewer services; thus, the out-of-pocket fees set by practitioners play a key role in determining the number of services that are actually consumed. 10,11 The significance and impact of out-ofpocket expenses associated with health care are not limited to Australia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Articles in this issue of the MJA 1 , 2 and elsewhere 3 ‐ 5 have reported significant variation in the fees charged by specialist physicians and surgeons. These variations raise questions about excessive health care costs, as well as about barriers to access for patients 2 , 4 , 5…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%