2019
DOI: 10.11124/jbisrir-2017-003921
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Out-of-pocket expenses related to aging in place for frail older people: a scoping review protocol

Abstract: Production of this report is made possible by financial contributions from Health Canada and provincial and territorial governments. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of Health Canada or any provincial or territorial government.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 88 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Findings from this review, particularly about the direct, private (out-of-pocket) costs of caregiving are consistent with another literature review exploring global out-of-pocket expenditure in the context of aging at home. 44 This study emphasized the importance of developing standardizing approaches to valuating out-of-pocket spending as a percentage of family income for older adults living at home, which informed the focus on home care in our review. Several studies suggest that that home care is not as cost-effective as policymakers had hoped, as the care and cost burden has effectively been transferred from the system to caregivers themselves, thereby increasing societal costs, defined as direct costs and the imputed value of caregivers’ unpaid labor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Findings from this review, particularly about the direct, private (out-of-pocket) costs of caregiving are consistent with another literature review exploring global out-of-pocket expenditure in the context of aging at home. 44 This study emphasized the importance of developing standardizing approaches to valuating out-of-pocket spending as a percentage of family income for older adults living at home, which informed the focus on home care in our review. Several studies suggest that that home care is not as cost-effective as policymakers had hoped, as the care and cost burden has effectively been transferred from the system to caregivers themselves, thereby increasing societal costs, defined as direct costs and the imputed value of caregivers’ unpaid labor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%