2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12205-020-1346-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Out-of-Plane Response of ECC Strengthened Masonry Wallets with Openings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it can be concluded that ECC sheets efficiently reduce the number of yielded elements in the URM wall and also, the higher the ECC thickness, the less the yielded elements. In the study of Singh and Munjal [35] the optimum thickness of the ECC sheets used for retrofitting the masonry walls is between 20-50 mm. However, to investigate the bond failure of the models by increasing the thickness of the walls from 20 to 30 mm, in addition to the cohesive behavior presented previously, two other interacting approaches connecting masonry prism and ECC sheets are used and the results are compared.…”
Section: Numerical Analysis Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, it can be concluded that ECC sheets efficiently reduce the number of yielded elements in the URM wall and also, the higher the ECC thickness, the less the yielded elements. In the study of Singh and Munjal [35] the optimum thickness of the ECC sheets used for retrofitting the masonry walls is between 20-50 mm. However, to investigate the bond failure of the models by increasing the thickness of the walls from 20 to 30 mm, in addition to the cohesive behavior presented previously, two other interacting approaches connecting masonry prism and ECC sheets are used and the results are compared.…”
Section: Numerical Analysis Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A finite element analysis (FEA) is conducted to simulate the laboratory experiments that were carried out by Singh and Munjal [35]. Table 6 compares the results we obtained in the numerical modeling and the experimental studies, and Figure 9 depicts both the load-displacement curves.…”
Section: Validation Of Numerical Model and Mesh Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is found that SHCC can greatly improve the out-of-plane strength and ductility of masonry structure through bending test, local-loading test, uniform-loading test and low-speed impact Frontiers in Materials frontiersin.org test (Singh and Munjal, 2020). This can effectively prevent masonry structure from collapse and destruction in earthquake and other sudden disasters.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Angle of dilation (Ψ) [28] 20 Eccentricity ratio (ε) [29] 0.1 Ratio of biaxial-to-axial compressive stress (σ b0 /σ c0 ) [30] 1.16…”
Section: Notation Valuementioning
confidence: 99%