2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.avb.2018.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Out of place: Sexualities, sexual violence, and heteronormativity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These people suffer from various forms of socio-economic and cultural injustices, but mostly they feel they are denied recognition, meaning that heterosexuality is privileged and homosexuality is devaluated (Takács 2015 :9). In order to fully understand the challenges the LGBT community faces, it is important to understand the concept of heteronormativity, which is still accepted in many segments of society and refers to the ‘normalisation of heterosexuality through social structures, social practices, and social institutions’ (Javaid 2018 :84). The belief that other sexual orientations are abnormal or inferior to heterosexuality is a source of oppression, resulting in heterosexism and homophobic attitudes, creating a hostile climate for LGBT people (Mostert, Gordon & Kriegler 2015 :116; Salminen 2015 :11).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These people suffer from various forms of socio-economic and cultural injustices, but mostly they feel they are denied recognition, meaning that heterosexuality is privileged and homosexuality is devaluated (Takács 2015 :9). In order to fully understand the challenges the LGBT community faces, it is important to understand the concept of heteronormativity, which is still accepted in many segments of society and refers to the ‘normalisation of heterosexuality through social structures, social practices, and social institutions’ (Javaid 2018 :84). The belief that other sexual orientations are abnormal or inferior to heterosexuality is a source of oppression, resulting in heterosexism and homophobic attitudes, creating a hostile climate for LGBT people (Mostert, Gordon & Kriegler 2015 :116; Salminen 2015 :11).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Being single demands a carefully planned performance” (Lahad :109). On the other hand, he can bravely accept singlehood within heterosexual spaces (see Javaid ). Even though it may be stigmatizing, he can accept singlehood in an empowered way.…”
Section: The Ghost Of the Queer Singlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Goffman () reminds us that we still continue to spend so much care and time managing our impressions (the way we talk, the way we appear to others, and the way we construct our lifestyles) in order to prevent stigma or embarrassment from looming large. In their everyday life, gay singles pay attention to how they talk, how they present themselves to others, and how they form patterns of their lifestyle in order to navigate through heterosexual spaces (Brekhus ) and the everyday threat of homophobia (Javaid ). It could be argued that gay singles prepare themselves for social interactions by considering temporal dimensions to try to control their impression management.…”
Section: The Ghost Of the Queer Singlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, casual sex enables the men to construct hegemonic masculinity in chemsex contexts in relation to other men who also embody hegemonic masculinity. Together, they become hegemonically masculine men who reaffirm to one another that they are powerful, not powerless, and oppressors, not oppressed, which are in line with normative heterosexuality standards and ideals (Javaid, 2018b).…”
Section: Hegemonic Masculinity and Chemsexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(p. 3)On average, as drug use is more common among gay and bisexual men than heterosexual men (Amaro, 2016), it may be that gay and bisexual men are drawing on masculine conducts to verify, embody and reclaim some form of power that echoes a powerful heterosexual discourse of power. Heterosexuality still remains as the idealised form of sexuality, the glamorous, the wanted and the ‘normal’ (Jackson, 2006; Javaid, 2018a, 2018b; Warner, 1999). As power is invariably being negotiated in chemsex contexts through various different ways, such as the embodiment of HIV and drawing on masculine behaviours including ‘slamming’ and sexual promiscuity, the stubborn persistence of barebacking remains intact as a way in which to fight back against homophobia (Crossley, 2004).…”
Section: Theorizing and Making Sense Of Power Drug Taking And Sexualmentioning
confidence: 99%