2016
DOI: 10.1063/1.4953214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Out-of-phase Andreev transports in a double-quantum-dot Cooper-pair splitter

Abstract: We investigate the Andreev transports through a double-quantum-dot Cooper-pair splitter with an additional direct coupling between the dots. It is found that when finite magnetic flux is applied through this structure, its induced phase adjusts the local and crossed Andreev reflections in different manners. Moreover, in the presence of appropriate magnetic flux, the crossed Andreev reflection can be efficiently enhanced, accompanied by the suppression of the local Andreev reflection. Such a result exists in bo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One can generally expect an enhancement of CAR processes when the magnetic configuration changes from the parallel to the antiparallel one, since then the nonlocal processes are mainly determined by a fast majority spin channel, while the local processes are slower because they depend on the minority spin subband [32,57]. However, it turns out that this rule can depend on the position of dots' levels and interference effects [16,17,30,34,40,58]. Quantum interference can in fact make the situation quite counterintuitive and re- verse the role of CAR and DAR processes, as we discuss below.…”
Section: A Andreev Linear Conductancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One can generally expect an enhancement of CAR processes when the magnetic configuration changes from the parallel to the antiparallel one, since then the nonlocal processes are mainly determined by a fast majority spin channel, while the local processes are slower because they depend on the minority spin subband [32,57]. However, it turns out that this rule can depend on the position of dots' levels and interference effects [16,17,30,34,40,58]. Quantum interference can in fact make the situation quite counterintuitive and re- verse the role of CAR and DAR processes, as we discuss below.…”
Section: A Andreev Linear Conductancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transport properties of quantum-dot-based CPS are already relatively well understood [13,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. Such systems can be modeled by a double quantum dot Anderson-type Hamiltonian, with the two dots coupled to a common superconducting lead and each dot attached to a normal electrode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the Heisenberg equation of motion, the current can be rewritten as J = −e j,kσ [V jk G < jk,σ (t, t) + c.c], where G < jk,σ (t, t ) = i c † kσ (t )d jσ (t) is the lesser Green's function. With the help of the Langreth continuation theorem and taking the Fourier transformation, we have [44]…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Y-shaped junction device consisting of two metallic leads, each connected to a SC electrode through two QDs, played the role of a Cooper-pair splitter and allowed control over CAR and LAR processes when tuning the gate voltages [73]. The Andreev transport properties of the double-QD Cooper-pair splitters [74][75][76][77] or multi-QD-MBSs setups [78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85] have also been theoretically explored. These systems show more complicated transport behavior due to quantum interference and many system parameters [79,85] and provide a feasible platform to probe MBSs [85].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%