Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest across the World: First report from the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR)

Kiguchi, Takeyuki; Okubo, Masashi; Nishiyama, Chika; Maconochie, Ian; Ong, Marcus Eng Hock; Kern, Karl B.; Wyckoff, Myra H.; McNally, Bryan; Christensen, Erika Frischknecht; Tjelmeland, Ingvild; Herlitz, Johan; Perkins, Gavin D; Booth, Scott; Finn, Judith; Shahidah, Nur; Shin, Sang Do; Bobrow, Bentley J.; Morrison, Laurie J.; Salo, Ari; Baldi, Enrico; Burkart, Roman; Lin, Chih‐Hao; Jouven, Xavier; Soar, Jasmeet; Nolan, Jerry P.; Iwami, Taku

doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.02.044

Cited by 314 publications

(207 citation statements)

References 56 publications

(53 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

195

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Cardiac arrest is among the leading causes of mortality worldwide, making it a significant health burden, with above 0.5 million deaths per year in North America alone 3 . Overall, the average survival rate is around 7‐8 percent 1 .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reversible hypoxic‐ischemic encephalopathy post prolonged out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest: A case series

Ata

Bilal

Osman

et al. 2021

Clinical Case Reports

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reversible hypoxic‐ischemic encephalopathy post prolonged out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest: A case series

Ata

Bilal

Osman

et al. 2021

Clinical Case Reports

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…4 Department of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore. 5 Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore. 6 Emergency Care Safety Institute, Public Safety Group, Burlington, MA, USA.…”

Section: Availability Of Data and Materialsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Worldwide, SCD is the most common cause of death accounting for 17 million deaths every year or 25% of all global mortality [1]. Outof-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a global health issue with incidence reported as 40.6 per 100,000 person-years in Europe, 47.3 in North America, 45.9 in Asia, and 51.1 in Australia [2][3][4][5].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training strategies in the times of COVID-19: a systematic literature review comparing different training methodologies

Ali

Hisam

Shaukat

et al. 2021

Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Traditional, instructor led, in-person training of CPR skills has become more challenging due to COVID-19 pandemic. We compared the learning outcomes of standard in-person CPR training (ST) with alternative methods of training such as hybrid or online-only training (AT) on CPR performance, quality, and knowledge among laypersons with no previous CPR training. Methods We searched PubMed and Google Scholar for relevant articles from January 1995 to May 2020. Covidence was used to review articles by two independent researchers. Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) Quality Assessment Tool was used to assess quality of the manuscripts. Results Of the 978 articles screened, twenty met the final inclusion criteria. All included studies had an experimental design and moderate to strong global quality rating. The trainees in ST group performed better on calling 911, time to initiate chest compressions, hand placement and chest compression depth. Trainees in AT group performed better in assessing scene safety, calling for help, response time including initiating first rescue breathing, adequate ventilation volume, compression rates, shorter hands-off time, confidence, willingness to perform CPR, ability to follow CPR algorithm, and equivalent or better knowledge retention than standard teaching methodology. Conclusion AT methods of CPR training provide an effective alternative to the standard in-person CPR for large scale public training.

show abstract

“…The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation that describes data on systems of care and outcomes following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) from nine national and seven regional registries across the world reported that the provision of bystander CPR was 19.1-79.0% in all registries. Survival to hospital discharge or 30-day survival after emergency medical service-treated OHCA was 3.1-20.4% across all registries [4].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 95%

Comparative Effectiveness of Simulation versus Serious Game for Training Nursing Students in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Randomized Control Trial

Farsi

Yazdani

Butler

et al. 2021

International Journal of Computer Games Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background. The proper implementation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is crucial in saving patients. Purpose. This study was aimed at evaluating the difference in educating nursing students on CPR when using the traditional simulation training with a mannequin versus a more novel serious game training on the smartphone platform. Methods. This randomized control trial was conducted in 2018-2019. Through purposive sampling, 56 nursing students were selected and randomly assigned to three groups: a simulation-based CPR training, CPR training using a serious game on the smartphone platform, and a control group that received no CPR training. Each student was evaluated pre- and posttraining on CPR knowledge and skill. Results. Both the simulation and serious game training groups increased CPR abilities two weeks after training. The control group did not show improvement in skill or knowledge of CPR. The simulation and serious game intervention groups demonstrated better scores on the knowledge questionnaire and on the CPR skill demonstration in comparison to the control group. However, the simulation group and the serious game group showed no significant difference in knowledge ( 9.55 ± 2.81 vs. 7.77 ± 2.46 ; p = 0.065 ) or CPR skill demonstration ( 27.17 ± 2.81 vs. 25.72 ± 3.98 ; p = 0.988 ). The overall scores for CPR knowledge did not meet minimum expectations (70% score) in either the simulation (47.75%) or serious game (38.85%) group. However, both groups demonstrated adequate CPR skill on demonstration (simulation 87.64% and serious game 83.06%). Conclusions. Both the simulation and serious game training groups were found to increase CPR skill. CPR training would likely benefit from a multimodal approach to education.

show abstract

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest across the World: First report from the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR)

Cited by 314 publications

References 56 publications

Reversible hypoxic‐ischemic encephalopathy post prolonged out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest: A case series

Reversible hypoxic‐ischemic encephalopathy post prolonged out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest: A case series

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training strategies in the times of COVID-19: a systematic literature review comparing different training methodologies

Comparative Effectiveness of Simulation versus Serious Game for Training Nursing Students in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Randomized Control Trial

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About