Nonequilibrium Statistical Physics of Small Systems 2013
DOI: 10.1002/9783527658701.ch9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Out‐of‐Equilibrium Generalized Fluctuation–Dissipation Relations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, in virtue of Eqs. (14), (15), (16) and (17), the return probability F * t (0|e µ |e ν ) is given explicitly by its Laplace transform…”
Section: B Single-vacancy Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, in virtue of Eqs. (14), (15), (16) and (17), the return probability F * t (0|e µ |e ν ) is given explicitly by its Laplace transform…”
Section: B Single-vacancy Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the linear response regime, a fundamental result is the fluctuationdissipation theorem, which relates system response and spontaneous fluctuations. Within the last years a great effort has been devoted to generalizations of this theorem to nonequilibrium situations [1][2][3][4], when the time reversal symmetry is broken, and also to elucidating the effects of the higher order contributions in the external perturbation [5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. From experimental perspective, theoretical understanding of the latter issues is of an utmost importance in several fields, such as active microrheology [12][13][14] and dynamics of nonequilibrium fluids [15,16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in colloidal suspensions. In this regime, both fluctuations of the probe that can not be described correctly if the medium is treated as a continuous bath and super-diffusion regimes have been reported [2][3][4][5][6] Within a broader context, modeling the response of a medium to a perturbation created by a tracer particle, biased by an external force, is a ubiquitous problem in physics, which has been the subject of a large number of theoretical works [7][8][9]. The resulting stochastic dynamics of the whole system is however a many-body problem which is difficult (or even impossible) to solve even in the simplest case when the particle-particle interactions are a mere hard-core.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For that reason, in most approaches the microscopic structure of the bath is not taken into account explicitly, and the response functions are determined instead by using some effective bath dynamics, modelled via Langevin or generalized Langevin [10] equations (see also Refs. [7][8][9]). While these approaches are rather efficient, they cannot account for the detailed correlations between the tracer particle and the fluctuating density profiles of the bath particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%