Our Ongoing Evolution of Peer Review

Siemens, D. Robert

doi:10.1097/ju.0000000000002768

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Other bias can occur depending on how reviewers are selected, especially when there are undisclosed conflicts of interest. This has led to many calls for greater transparency of the review process to address concerns around fairness and quality (Siemens, 2022). One suggestion is to adopt open peer review processes, which will be discussed in the future directions section below.…”

Section: Challenges To Peer Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

The importance of a good review(er) for educational technology research

Corrin

Lodge

Thompson

2023

AJET

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The process of peer review has been central to academic publishing in educational technology for at least 50 years. In this editorial we discuss what makes a good review as well as a good reviewer for AJET. This includes an overview of the peer review process and the identification of key features of a good review. We discuss the selection and appointment of reviewers with reference specifically to AJET, and how decisions are made when assigning reviewers to articles. Current challenges facing peer review both broadly in academia and specifically in our field involve the intersection of increasing demand for reviews (due to an expansion of the number of journals), limited opportunities for professional development, and decreasing time available for service to the academy and community for researchers. We conclude with a discussion of the future of peer review practices and how these relate to future directions for AJET.

show abstract

Section: Challenges To Peer Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

The importance of a good review(er) for educational technology research

Corrin

Lodge

Thompson

2023

AJET

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In April 2022, The Journal of Urology ® began publishing peer review reports with reviewers’ names listed on the online edition of accepted manuscripts. 5 These are the first steps of a dynamic process in which the suggestions and responses of the community will hopefully play a role in expanding transparency.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Peer Review in Urology Journals: What Is the Best Peer Review Model?

Kaplan-Marans

Khurgin

2023

Journal of Urology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Our Ongoing Evolution of Peer Review

Cited by 2 publications

References 6 publications

The importance of a good review(er) for educational technology research

The importance of a good review(er) for educational technology research

Peer Review in Urology Journals: What Is the Best Peer Review Model?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About