2000
DOI: 10.3138/chr.81.3.403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Our History Syllabus Has Us Gasping’: History in Canadian Schools B Past, Present, and Future

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We would benefit from asking how teaching history can both face up to these difficult pasts while maintaining a sense of present-future efficacy (Osborne, 2000). Dissecting students and teachers' conceptualizations of evil opens up the potential to affect historical thinking and avoid fatalism, fostering agency and hope.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We would benefit from asking how teaching history can both face up to these difficult pasts while maintaining a sense of present-future efficacy (Osborne, 2000). Dissecting students and teachers' conceptualizations of evil opens up the potential to affect historical thinking and avoid fatalism, fostering agency and hope.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today's debate is, in fact, the fifth time in the last 100 years that history teaching has been the subject of public scrutiny (Osborne 2000a(Osborne , 2001). The first occurred in the 1890s, when educationists and others worried that Canada lacked a national spirit and that the waves of new immigrants might endanger Canada's emerging sense of national identity.…”
Section: Proposals For Reformmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In this sense, schooling is an instrument in the enterprise of citizenship, providing an institutional implementation of modernist notions of equality and universality of opportunity, and is consequently criticized for enabling and propagating a status quo that benefits those who enjoy a degree of capital. However, while Isin and Wood's reminder of Marshall's exposure of the reproduction of inequities systemic in public education raises important alarm bells and Olssen's recognition of the unequal distribution of power within state sponsored school systems is significant, according to Osborne (2000), the process of creating national citizens has and will continue to be fraught with divergent and competing interpretations as schooling has never been a simple matter of imposing and reinforcing the hegemony of the dominant class. Yet, as Glass (2000) identifies, there is a key paradox inherent to schooling.…”
Section: Citizenship and Schoolingmentioning
confidence: 99%