1971
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1971.tb02337.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Our Grammar Rules Are Hurting Us

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of researchers have pointed out the problems that result from the tendency of textbooks to present rules of thumb, given that these generalizations often neglect fairly frequent instances when actual usage contradicts them (e.g., Blyth, ; Bull, ; Bull & Lamadrid, ; Chastain, ; Dansereau, ; Doman, ; Frantzen, , ; Garrett, ; Herschensohn, ; Jean & Simard, ; Lunn, , ; Negueruela & Lantolf, , 2006; Palmer, ; Peacock, ; Quilter, ; Studerus, ; Whitley, ; Whitley & González, ; Yáñez Prieto, ). Jean and Simard () argued the following:
Grammar rules are not laws .
…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of researchers have pointed out the problems that result from the tendency of textbooks to present rules of thumb, given that these generalizations often neglect fairly frequent instances when actual usage contradicts them (e.g., Blyth, ; Bull, ; Bull & Lamadrid, ; Chastain, ; Dansereau, ; Doman, ; Frantzen, , ; Garrett, ; Herschensohn, ; Jean & Simard, ; Lunn, , ; Negueruela & Lantolf, , 2006; Palmer, ; Peacock, ; Quilter, ; Studerus, ; Whitley, ; Whitley & González, ; Yáñez Prieto, ). Jean and Simard () argued the following:
Grammar rules are not laws .
…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%