2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.03.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Our capricious vessels: The influence of stent design and vessel geometry on the mechanics of intracranial aneurysm stent deployment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the device and implantation modeling is constantly refined (including the design and material properties of the device, 21 its interaction with the vessel, 21 the deployment procedure, 19 the computational scheme 20 ), increasing the precision of the model at the expense of the computational cost and manual intervention. However, the relevance of each model component is still debated because comparisons with in vivo stent implantations are poorly reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, the device and implantation modeling is constantly refined (including the design and material properties of the device, 21 its interaction with the vessel, 21 the deployment procedure, 19 the computational scheme 20 ), increasing the precision of the model at the expense of the computational cost and manual intervention. However, the relevance of each model component is still debated because comparisons with in vivo stent implantations are poorly reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we have recently proposed 17 a virtual stent-deployment method able to predict the local properties of braided stents (wire location, angles, porosities) and implantation parameters (stent length, landing zone) with minimal computational cost. Contrary to other methods that involve either cumbersome finite element analysis [18][19][20][21] or complex phenomenologic constraints 13,20,[22][23][24][25][26] to simulate the stent dynamics, the proposed model is based on a minimal number of geometric assumptions (ie, a constant interwire distance and tubular stent envelope), which were validated in vitro and in vivo for the Pipeline Embolization Device (PED; Covidien, Irvine, California).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main concern in this work is that our having not modeling the graft can contribute to different mechanical behavior [11]. Finally, we hope that future advances will be supported by experimental studies that are required to validate our numerical observations.…”
Section: Limitationmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Additionally, the stent should be flexible enough to allow easy placement and conformity after deployment, specifically in thoracic aorta, which curvature can highly contribute to type1-a endoleaks and device migration [9]. Numerous computational studies have investigated the influence of stent design on vessel scaffolding in the carotid artery [10] and stent placement in cerebral aneurysm [11]. Similarly, the nitinol stent design has been shown to have a considerable impact on crimping and fatigue behavior [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wrong selection of the stents geometric characteristics can lead to complications. Some of the possible problems are: leakage, device displacement (migration), implant rupture, or arterial wall tissue damage (BLUM et al, 2001, JACOBS et al, 2003, LI et al, 2006, CORBETT et al, 2008, BOCK et al, 2012, MORRIS et al, 2013.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%