“…The situation was further complicated by what Uğur Ümit Üngör has described as a “program of demographic engineering” in eastern Anatolia, of which the Armenian genocide was merely the first wave, which made uncovering the depth of the impact of the war on civilians difficult because of the politically sensitive, highly charged debates over the fate of the Ottoman minority populations during and after the World War I (Göçek, 2006; Suny et al., 2011; Üngör, 2011). While the topic remains sensitive, the past decade has seen a shift as more scholars—both in Turkey and elsewhere—have begun to reassess the war's impact in Anatolia, examining the role that hunger, suffering, and disease wrought on the civilian population, particularly women, children, and orphans (Akın, 2014, 2018; Dağlar, 2008; Maksudyan, 2019; Metinsoy, 2017; Yanıkdağ, 2014). As in Europe, the widespread development and adoption of the fields of psychology and psychotherapy in the region are linked to the aftermath of the World War I (El Shakry, 2007; El Shakry, 2017; Yanıkdağ, 2014).…”