2009
DOI: 10.4161/psb.4.3.7867
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

OTS1 and OTS2 SUMO proteases link plant development and survival under salt stress

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…HMWC in the E3 ligase mutant siz1 were considerably loss-of-function generates leaf growth defects and late germination, also confirming previous evidence for the existence of an early flowering phenotype (Conti et al 2008). I n previous studies, overexpression of ULP1c/d already suggested a role for these proteases in rosette development (Conti et al 2009), and, more recently, ULP1c/d were shown to prevent accumulation of sumoylated DELLA proteins, which themselves lead to growth restraint (Conti et al 2014). Our current phenotypes are consistent with a model in which ulp1c/d growth defects can be attributed to SUMO-dependent stabilization of DELLAs (Fig.…”
Section: The Ulp1c/d Mutant Displays Altered Sumo-conjugate Levelssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…HMWC in the E3 ligase mutant siz1 were considerably loss-of-function generates leaf growth defects and late germination, also confirming previous evidence for the existence of an early flowering phenotype (Conti et al 2008). I n previous studies, overexpression of ULP1c/d already suggested a role for these proteases in rosette development (Conti et al 2009), and, more recently, ULP1c/d were shown to prevent accumulation of sumoylated DELLA proteins, which themselves lead to growth restraint (Conti et al 2014). Our current phenotypes are consistent with a model in which ulp1c/d growth defects can be attributed to SUMO-dependent stabilization of DELLAs (Fig.…”
Section: The Ulp1c/d Mutant Displays Altered Sumo-conjugate Levelssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Similar to the ubiquitylation system, sumoylation is processed through the SUMO-specific E1, E2 and E3 enzymes, and SUMO is covalently conjugated to the target consensus motif ΨKxE/D (Ψ, hydrophobic amino acid; K, SUMO target lysine; x, any amino acid; E/D, glutamic acid/aspartic acid). Both loss- and gain-of-function analyses reveal that sumoylation functions in the regulation of responses to abiotic and biotic stresses [134,135,137], such as the response to nutrient availability [138140], drought tolerance [141,142], basal thermotolerance [143], salt stress tolerance [144,145], copper tolerance [146] and innate immunity [147,148], as well as the development [149153] and regulation of ABA signaling [154,155]. As the siz1 mutant, which is impaired in the SUMO E3 ligase [138], exhibits hypersensitivity to chilling and freezing stresses [26], sumoylation contributes to the regulation of cold signaling through the stabilization of ICE1.…”
Section: Post-translational Regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are together essential for normal embryogenesis (Saracco et al ., ) and also jointly suppress salicylic acid (SA)‐dependent defence responses (van den Burg et al ., ; Cheong et al ., ). SUMO proteases that catalyse deconjugation to recycle free SUMO have been shown to be implicated in multiple regulatory pathways critical for normal plant development (Colby et al ., ; Hermkes et al ., ; Murtas et al ., ; Reeves et al ., ; Xu et al ., ) and plant–pathogen interaction for altering host cell defence (Roden et al ., ) as well as plant slat tolerance (Conti et al ., , ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%