2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.00940.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ototoxicity after intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a case report

Abstract: Recently, the National Cancer Institute endorsed intraperitoneal (IP) therapy as the treatment of choice for optimally debulked epithelial ovarian cancer. However, there are no drug regimens that are clearly indicated, and the exact method of administration has not been established. Furthermore and most importantly, physicians are unaware of what toxicities should be expected with their use of IP therapy. We report a recent unanticipated toxicity from IP cisplatin therapy and review the literature. A 63-year-o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the split dosing of cisplatin, of the 21 patients receiving this modified regimen, two were unable to complete the recommended treatment due to grade 3–4 hearing loss (Landrum et al, 2011). Additionally, there has been one other case report demonstrating profound hearing loss after one dose of intraperitoneal cisplatin for treatment of ovarian cancer (Nieves et al, 2007). Our case differs in that she received a lower dose of cisplatin (75 mg/m 2 rather than 100 mg/m 2 ) and at a longer interval from surgery (4 vs. 2 weeks).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the split dosing of cisplatin, of the 21 patients receiving this modified regimen, two were unable to complete the recommended treatment due to grade 3–4 hearing loss (Landrum et al, 2011). Additionally, there has been one other case report demonstrating profound hearing loss after one dose of intraperitoneal cisplatin for treatment of ovarian cancer (Nieves et al, 2007). Our case differs in that she received a lower dose of cisplatin (75 mg/m 2 rather than 100 mg/m 2 ) and at a longer interval from surgery (4 vs. 2 weeks).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%