2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.09.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ototoxicity After Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy and Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy in Children With Medulloblastoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
75
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The role of new techniques, for example IMRT (Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy), tomotherapy, protontherapy, and carbon ion radiation in the reduction of doses to OARs during the irradiation of brain malignancies is under investigation [63][64][65], as well as the role of new imaging techniques [66]. Results also seem promising for medulloblastoma patients, although they should be prospectively evaluated and some reports are not completely satisfactory [63][64][65][67][68][69][70][71][72], indicating that particular attention should be given to the volumes of treatment and to the toxic effects of concomitant chemotherapy [73,74]. Despite the small number of analysed patients, our results seem to show that radiation therapy results in a good outcome without a significant negative late impact on neuropsychological abilities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of new techniques, for example IMRT (Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy), tomotherapy, protontherapy, and carbon ion radiation in the reduction of doses to OARs during the irradiation of brain malignancies is under investigation [63][64][65], as well as the role of new imaging techniques [66]. Results also seem promising for medulloblastoma patients, although they should be prospectively evaluated and some reports are not completely satisfactory [63][64][65][67][68][69][70][71][72], indicating that particular attention should be given to the volumes of treatment and to the toxic effects of concomitant chemotherapy [73,74]. Despite the small number of analysed patients, our results seem to show that radiation therapy results in a good outcome without a significant negative late impact on neuropsychological abilities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the locoregional control rates were not statistically different, target dose coverage was better for IMRT [42]. Regarding late toxicity, the main complication that IMRT might have an advantage compared with more conventional techniques is ototoxicity in children receiving RT and cisplatin for medulloblastoma [35,44,45]. The initial paper from The Methodist Hospital of 15 patients with a median follow-up of 18 months demonstrated a reduction from 64 to 13 % grades 3 to 4 hearing loss with lowering of RT dose to the cochlea [44].…”
Section: Use Of Novel Rt Technologymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The initial paper from The Methodist Hospital of 15 patients with a median follow-up of 18 months demonstrated a reduction from 64 to 13 % grades 3 to 4 hearing loss with lowering of RT dose to the cochlea [44]. A more recent analysis with 44 children and a median audiogram follow-up of 41 months showed 25 % grades 3 to 4 hearing loss [45]. Another report from Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center showed a 6 % grade 3 hearing loss with IMRT at a median audiogram follow-up of 19 months [35].…”
Section: Use Of Novel Rt Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various strategies have been considered to minimize platinum ototoxicity. Radiation reduction dose to the cochlea has been investigated, including the use of 3D conformal RT, IMRT, and proton therapy [72]. Once treatment is completed, long-term audiometric monitoring should continue.…”
Section: Ototoxicitymentioning
confidence: 99%